IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04312400.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Effects of perceived organisational politics and effort–reward imbalance on work outcomes – the moderating role of mindfulness

Author

Listed:
  • Ghulam Murtaza
  • Olivier Roques

    (CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon)

  • Qurat-Ul-Ain Talpur
  • Rahman Khan
  • Inam Ul Haq

    (University of Central Punjab, The University of Lahore, Riphah International University, Monash University [Malaysia], EUM Clermont-Ferrand - Ecole Universitaire de Management - Clermont-Ferrand - UdA - Université d'Auvergne - Clermont-Ferrand I)

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the moderating effects of mindfulness on the relationships between work stressors (perceived organisational politics [POP] and effort–reward imbalance [ERI]) and work outcomes (job burnout [JBO] and job satisfaction [JS]). Design/methodology/approach Time-lagged data were collected from public sector employees in France and Pakistan. The final samples (France, N = 204; Pakistan, N = 217) were tested using multiple moderating regression. Findings Mindfulness moderates the relationship between work stressors and work outcomes. Mindfulness serves as a personal resource for employees: it mitigates the negative influence that POP and ERI have on JBO and JS. Originality/value This study extends current knowledge on the relationships between work stressors and work outcomes across cultures by testing mindfulness as a valuable personal resource.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghulam Murtaza & Olivier Roques & Qurat-Ul-Ain Talpur & Rahman Khan & Inam Ul Haq, 2022. "Effects of perceived organisational politics and effort–reward imbalance on work outcomes – the moderating role of mindfulness," Post-Print hal-04312400, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04312400
    DOI: 10.1108/PR-09-2020-0706
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04312400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04312400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.