IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04300238.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Technological paradoxes and artificial intelligence implementation in healthcare. An application of paradox theory

Author

Listed:
  • Nidhi Singh

    (Jaipuria Institute of Management [Noida])

  • Monika Jain

    (BIMTECH - Birla Institute of Management Technology)

  • Muhammad Mustafa Kamal

    (Coventry University)

  • Rahul Bodhi

    (UPES - University of Petroleum and Energy Studies [Dehradun])

  • Bhumika Gupta

    (LITEM - Laboratoire en Innovation, Technologies, Economie et Management (EA 7363) - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - Université Paris-Saclay - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], IMT-BS - MMS - Département Management, Marketing et Stratégie - TEM - Télécom Ecole de Management - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

Abstract

AI is transforming healthcare system with many innovations in diagnosis, drug research and advancement in medical treatments. But there are several concerns and dilemmas related to data misuse, AI efficiency for critical diagnostic services, users' resistance, investment costs, funding issues, and so on that have been raised by many previous studies on the effective integration of AI in clinical settings. Using paradox theory in the organisational settings, the present study discusses several technological paradoxes associated with the adoption of AI in healthcare. In this regard, the study examines the views of diverse medical practitioners about using AI services for several medical needs. The study analyses the efficacy and limitations of AI services which develop several ethical dilemmas in the mind of medical practitioners and also suggest a few strategies for the adoption. Using grounded theory approach, the study collected views of 62 medical practitioners on these dimensions. The primary drivers to the adoption identified in the present study are: ease of use, automation efficacy, diagnostic accuracy, and cost efficiency. A lack of training and education, cultural and religious considerations, privacy issues and work insecurity are some of the concerns highlighted by the medical staffs. The study inferred a few paradoxes or ethical dilemmas of practitioners which need attentions. The study contributes to the existing literature on paradox theory and AI, and identifies a few under-discussed areas, drivers, and barriers of AI services are highlighted in the paper, which may lead to ethical concerns and steer AI adoption in healthcare.

Suggested Citation

  • Nidhi Singh & Monika Jain & Muhammad Mustafa Kamal & Rahul Bodhi & Bhumika Gupta, 2024. "Technological paradoxes and artificial intelligence implementation in healthcare. An application of paradox theory," Post-Print hal-04300238, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04300238
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122967
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Singh, Kuldeep & Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Mariani, Marcello, 2024. "Applications of generative AI and future organizational performance: The mediating role of explorative and exploitative innovation and the moderating role of ethical dilemmas and environmental dynamis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    2. Issa, Helmi & Jaber, Jad & Lakkis, Hussein, 2024. "Navigating AI unpredictability: Exploring technostress in AI-powered healthcare systems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04300238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.