IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04264656.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparison between two types of product placement on YouTube: the case of a placement that fulfills Internet users’ expectations and a placement that doesn’t fulfill Internet users’ expectations

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-François Lemoine

    (PRISM Sorbonne - Pôle de recherche interdisciplinaire en sciences du management - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, ESSCA Research Lab - ESSCA - Ecole Supérieure des Sciences Commerciales d'Angers)

  • Simon Régnier

    (PRISM Sorbonne - Pôle de recherche interdisciplinaire en sciences du management - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)

Abstract

This study focuses on the impact of product placement on a video sharing platform (YouTube). Previous research on product placement has been, for the most part, carried out for media such as cinema or television. For the purposes of this article, we will ask ourselves if the specificities of YouTube influence the impact that a product placement can have. To answer to this question, we conducted an experiment by comparing two of the most common types of placements on the platform, a first one that fulfills users' expectations and a second one that doesn't fulfill expectations. At the end of our study with 409 respondents, it appears that placement that doesn't fulfill expectations leads to better brand awareness, but also generates more negative emotions and has a more negative impact on attitude towards the brand. On the other hand, placement that fulfills expectations will generate more positive emotions and positively influencing attitude towards the brand.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-François Lemoine & Simon Régnier, 2023. "Comparison between two types of product placement on YouTube: the case of a placement that fulfills Internet users’ expectations and a placement that doesn’t fulfill Internet users’ expectations," Post-Print hal-04264656, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04264656
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04264656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04264656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.