IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04253462.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

‘Hierarchy of Causes’ and Theory of Money in Ricardo and Keynes

Author

Listed:
  • Ghislain Deleplace

    (LED - Laboratoire d'Economie Dionysien - UP8 - Université Paris 8 Vincennes-Saint-Denis)

Abstract

In a paper published in the December 2014 issue of Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Maria Cristina Marcuzzo concludes that "notwithstanding these profound epistemological differences, Ricardo's quest for a theory in which the hierarchy of causes is detectable in the structure of the arguments was also pursued by Keynes, who shared with Ricardo the recognition of its relevance and usefulness." This suggestion that Ricardo and Keynes – two authors with whom Marcuzzo shared a lifelong intellectual companionship – might be bedfellows on methodological issues is all the more surprising since it relies on a distinction made by Ricardo between "permanent" and "temporary" causes, which Marcuzzo illustrates with the notion of "natural quantity of money" – that is, a notion which could hardly be found in Keynes's General Theory. This divergence on the conception of money is one of the "profound epistemological differences" acknowledged by Marcuzzo, but in her view it does not preclude a common quest by both authors for a "hierarchy of causes." It may then be worthwhile inquiring whether Ricardo's and Keynes's respective theories of money are consistent with such common methodological approach. The conclusion of the paper is that a "hierarchy of causes" may be detected in both monetary theories under one condition: the existence of an institutional datum (the legal price of gold in Ricardo, the central-bank rate of interest in Keynes) which regulates the quantity of money.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghislain Deleplace, 2019. "‘Hierarchy of Causes’ and Theory of Money in Ricardo and Keynes," Post-Print hal-04253462, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04253462
    DOI: 10.4324/9781315108971
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04253462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04253462/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4324/9781315108971?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcuzzo, Maria Cristina, 2014. "On The Notion Of Permanent And Temporary Causes: The Legacy Of Ricardo," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(4), pages 421-434, December.
    2. Depoortère, Christophe, 2013. "William Nassau Senior And David Ricardo On The Method Of Political Economy," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 19-42, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghislain Deleplace, 2020. "Orthodox versus Unorthodox Views on Ricardo’s Theory of Money," Post-Print hal-04253395, HAL.
    2. Olivier Rosell, 2013. "L’apport de Robert TORRENS à la théorie Ricardienne du salaire naturel," Working Papers hal-04141164, HAL.
    3. Ghislain Deleplace, 2019. "“Orthodox versus Unorthodox Views on Ricardo’s Theory of Money”," Post-Print hal-04429068, HAL.
    4. Ghislain Deleplace, 2019. "“Orthodox versus Unorthodox Views on Ricardo’s Theory of Money”," Post-Print hal-04429116, HAL.
    5. repec:drm:wpaper:2013-39 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04253462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.