IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04240720.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Strategy-As-Action perspective as a model to analyse government's strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Fabien Eymas

    (CREGO - Centre de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UB - Université de Bourgogne - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] - UFC - Université de Franche-Comté - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE])

  • Faouzi Bensebaa

    (UPN - Université Paris Nanterre)

Abstract

In this paper, we expect to contribute to answer to the last question of the PSG XI's call-for-papers focusing on a theoretical approach usually considered as irrelevant in public management (McNabb and Lee, 2021): the Strategy-As-Action (Grimm et al., 2006) perspective, more usually known as Competitive dynamics (Chen and Miller, 2012; 2015; Smith et al., 2001). Although this theoretical approach holds potential to improve our understanding of the concrete strategies implemented by public organisations to cope with an increasingly hostile and turbulent environment, it has, to the best of our knowledge, never been used in the field of public management. In this context, this paper aims to contribute to future research on strategic management in government by proposing an analytical model that, focusing on the interactions between the organisation under study and its stakeholders, captures the determinants and consequences of these interactions, as well as the strategic behaviour and repertoire of strategic actions of the organisation analysed, the whole in order to increase the performance of the organisation. The full paper will be organised as follows. In the first section, we take stock of the literature on the Strategy-As-Action perspective. This stream makes the concrete actions of organisations its basic unit of analysis (Smith et al., 2001) and integrates at once the external (Porter, 1980), internal (Barney, 1991; Peteraf, 1993) and cognitive (Marcel et al., 2011) factors that affect these actions. These (inter)actions, which are embedded in a dialogue between the organisation and its stakeholders, describe relationships of various natures: cooperative, coopetitive or rivalrous (Chen and Miller, 2015; Eymas and Bensebaa, 2021). Finally, action set analysis allows us to characterise the strategic behaviour of an organisation and to study its strategic repertoire in order to improve its performance (Smith et al., 2001). Based on these theoretical foundations, section two examines prior research on strategy of public organisations. This is a field in which strategic planning plays a major role, particularly because it links the strong legal constraints on public organisations with their operational activities (Bryson, 2015) and is positively correlated with performance (George et al., 2019). Moreover, classical strategic management theories are relatively unused in public context due to the significant differences between the private and public sectors (Joyce, 2022). Integrating the two research streams, we develop in a third section an analytical model to analyse government's strategies and make propositions We make proposals on the links between strategic actions, repertoire of actions and behaviour on the one hand and the performance of the public organisation on the other.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabien Eymas & Faouzi Bensebaa, 2023. "The Strategy-As-Action perspective as a model to analyse government's strategies," Post-Print hal-04240720, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04240720
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04240720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.