IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04234340.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Preventing autonomy loss with multicomponent geriatric interventions A resource-saving strategy? Evidence from the SPRINT-T study

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Rapp

    (LIRAES (URP_ 4470) - Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Recherche Appliquée en Economie de la Santé - UPCité - Université Paris Cité)

  • Jonathan Sicsic

    (LIRAES (URP_ 4470) - Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Recherche Appliquée en Economie de la Santé - UPCité - Université Paris Cité)

  • Jérôme Ronchetti

    (Laboratoire de Recherche Magellan - UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Lyon)

  • Americo Cicchetti

Abstract

Background The objective of healthy aging strategies is to support interventions targeting autonomy loss prevention, with the assumption that these interventions are likely to be efficient by simultaneously improving clinical outcomes and saving costs. Methods We compare the economic impact of two interventions targeting frailty prevention in older European populations: a multicomponent intervention including physical activity monitoring, nutrition management, and information and communications technology use and a relatively simple healthy aging lifestyle education program based on a series of workshops. Our sample includes 1519 participants from 11 European countries, who were men and women aged 70 years or older. Our econometric model explores trends in several outcomes depending on intervention receipt and frailty status at baseline. Results Implementing a multicomponent intervention among frail older people does not lead to a lower use of care and cannot prevent quality of life losses associated with aging. However, it impacts older people's sense of priorities and interest in the future. We find no statistically significant difference between the two interventions, suggesting that the implementation of a multicomponent intervention may not be the most efficient strategy. The impact of the interventions does not differ by frailty status at baseline. Conclusions Our results show the need to implement healthy aging strategies that are more focused on people's interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Rapp & Jonathan Sicsic & Jérôme Ronchetti & Americo Cicchetti, 2023. "Preventing autonomy loss with multicomponent geriatric interventions A resource-saving strategy? Evidence from the SPRINT-T study," Post-Print hal-04234340, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04234340
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04234340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.