Author
Listed:
- Agathe Morinière
- Irène Georgescu
- Sea Matilda Bez
(MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UM1 - Université Montpellier 1 - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UM2 - Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School, Labex Entreprendre - UM - Université de Montpellier, UM - Université de Montpellier)
Abstract
Digital feedback platforms on which consumers evaluate and the rate the performance of service delivery has exploded in recent years in the virtual world and has received growing interest in the online accounting literature (Jeacle, 2017; Lowe et al., 2012; Van den Bussche & Dambrin, 2021). These digital platforms can be perceived as extended surveillance and control spaces (Martinez, 2011; Brivot & Gendron, 2011). Known as Amazon or TripAdvisor, they have become central in an increasing number of sectors and have started to enter highly regulated industries such as health (Bez et al., 2023) Thanks to its digital properties, digital feedback platform has facilitated information sharing and transparency as organizations and professionals are being held accountable. Thus, there is concern that the virtual world will ultimately lead to a new age based on digital technologies for measurement and surveillance, enabling evaluation, ratings, and rankings aimed at rendering professionals' conduct knowable. Within the healthcare sector, strengthening accountability is one of the highest priorities in order to enhance patient satisfaction and improve physicians' quality of care. However, the rising importance of this new form of accountability suggests that the medical work's modalities of evaluation are evolving, which in turn gives rise to different concerns for the future of medicine (Patel et al., 2015; Turk et al., 2020). The potential of online patient evaluation as a driver of substantial transformations has been highlighted in prior literature and has given rise to different concerns for doctors about how this will impact them, their practice, and their patients (James et al., 2017). Against this backdrop, the accounting literature is turning its attention to the critical implications of the impact of this new form of accountability on organizations and professions (Agostino et al., 2022; Chua et al., 2022; Nørreklit & Trenca, 2021; Scott & Orlikowski, 2012) as "new information and control possibilities are created as more customer, employee and stakeholder interactions happen digitally" (Arnaboldi et al., 2017, p. 763). Indeed, the move to take into account evaluations done by these feedback platform is raising important questions about how evaluations are changing and what outcomes are being generated for the organizations and professionals being evaluated (Orlikowski & Scott, 2014). The development of this mode of evaluation highlights the intensification of the consumer culture in the twentieth century and gives rise to unprecedented ways of evaluating physicians' behavior, creating conditions for a powerful new web of control processes (Lyon, 2001). However, thus far, scholarly understanding of the way online evaluation reshapes the mechanism of accountability for professionals in the context of emotional capitalism remains limited. In particular, little is known about how patient feedback platform may alter how medical expertise is evaluated and valued.
Suggested Citation
Agathe Morinière & Irène Georgescu & Sea Matilda Bez, 2023.
"Emotional capitalism and digitalization,"
Post-Print
hal-04229597, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04229597
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04229597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.