Author
Listed:
- Julie de Brux
- Patrice Geoffron
(LEDa - Laboratoire d'Economie de Dauphine - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
- Pierre-Benoît Joly
(TSV - Transformations Sociales et Politiques liées aux Vivants - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, LISIS - Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Sciences, Innovations, Sociétés - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Université Gustave Eiffel)
- Reza Lahidji
(GREGH - Groupement de Recherche et d'Etudes en Gestion à HEC - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
- Jacques Percebois
- Émile Quinet
(PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)
Abstract
Cigéo aims to store the most hazardous radioactive waste in a deep geological repository. The Socio-Economic Assessment (SEA) of the project is intended to analyse the gains and costs for the community, particularly in comparison with long-term storage, which will be the responsibility of future generations. This SEA has raised various methodological questions due to the duration of the project, the difficulties in monetising certain costs and benefits, the uncertainties about future societies and the choice of the discount rate. One conclusion is that Cigéo provides, through the safe burial of the waste, an ‘‘insurance benefit'' in the face of a risk of degradation of future societies.
Suggested Citation
Julie de Brux & Patrice Geoffron & Pierre-Benoît Joly & Reza Lahidji & Jacques Percebois & Émile Quinet, 2021.
"Déchets radioactifs : retour sur l’évaluation socio-économique du projet Cigéo,"
Post-Print
hal-04202331, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04202331
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04202331v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04202331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.