IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04148086.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Organizational conservatism: the good, the bad and the ugly
[Le conservatisme organisationnel : le bon, le mauvais et l'affreux]

Author

Listed:
  • Hamza Nidaazzi

    (UCA - Université Cadi Ayyad [Marrakech])

  • Hind Hourmat Allah

    (UCA - Université Cadi Ayyad [Marrakech])

Abstract

This paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of conservative companies, which are sometimes criticized for their tendency to avoid risks and prefer stability. They distinguish themselves through their financial stability and resistance to economic fluctuations, making them well-suited to markets that value predictability, especially in mature markets or those with significant entry barriers. Nevertheless, their caution can also result in rigidity, a lack of innovation, and a culture of fear among employees. These companies can represent an interesting option for investors seeking reliable and stable companies, but it is important to note that their cautious approach may impede their ability to innovate and transform, ultimately hindering their short-term competitiveness. This critical article analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of conservative companies, advocating for a balanced approach that acknowledges both the need for stability and the need for innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamza Nidaazzi & Hind Hourmat Allah, 2023. "Organizational conservatism: the good, the bad and the ugly [Le conservatisme organisationnel : le bon, le mauvais et l'affreux]," Post-Print hal-04148086, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04148086
    DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8101647
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04148086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04148086/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5281/zenodo.8101647?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04148086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.