IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04133644.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Méritocratie, humiliation, souffrance, épreuves, et « élites multiples » : une mise en dialogue de contributions récentes

Author

Listed:
  • Denis Requier-Desjardins

    (LEREPS - Laboratoire d'Etude et de Recherche sur l'Economie, les Politiques et les Systèmes Sociaux - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - UT - Université de Toulouse - Institut d'Études Politiques [IEP] - Toulouse - ENSFEA - École Nationale Supérieure de Formation de l'Enseignement Agricole de Toulouse-Auzeville)

Abstract

The approach followed in this contribution takes up a methodology already developed previously (Requier-Desjardins 2017), namely the dialogue of some recent contributions, whose simultaneity creates a space for debate that can be assumed in connection with a particular social situation. On the one hand, we put into relation the criticism of the meritocratic ideal, dominant in our market economies, which refers to the debate on justice theories, and the consideration of an emotional approach to economic behavior that allows us to pose, beyond the mere consideration of well-being, the question of suffering generated by this predominance of reference to merit. This dialogue concerns contributions which are both theoretical approaches and approaches based on empirical data, and which will lead us to raise the question of the contribution of this dialogue to the analysis of sectoral dynamics, namely in information technology or food sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Denis Requier-Desjardins, 2022. "Méritocratie, humiliation, souffrance, épreuves, et « élites multiples » : une mise en dialogue de contributions récentes," Post-Print hal-04133644, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04133644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04133644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.