IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04106437.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The emergence of cocreation logics within public administration: Roles of materiality in institutional work

Author

Listed:
  • Laurine Basse

    (CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon, AMU IMPGT - Institut de management public et de gouvernance territoriale - AMU - Aix Marseille Université, AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Magdalena Potz

    (AMU - Aix Marseille Université, CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon, AMU IMPGT - Institut de management public et de gouvernance territoriale - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Anaïs Saint Jonsson

    (CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon, AMU IMPGT - Institut de management public et de gouvernance territoriale - AMU - Aix Marseille Université, AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Sarah Serval

    (CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon, AMU IMPGT - Institut de management public et de gouvernance territoriale - AMU - Aix Marseille Université, AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Bruno Tiberghien

    (CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon, AMU IMPGT - Institut de management public et de gouvernance territoriale - AMU - Aix Marseille Université, AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

Abstract

We explore the emerging logic of co-creation in a local public organization which corresponds to a new paradigm and a set of new practices in public management (Torfing et al., 2019). This research context is particularly relevant for institutional scholars as an emerging logic is significantly underdeveloped in terms of prescribed practices (Bertels and Lawrence, 2016) which reinforces the interest in managerial agency (Lynn and al., 2000). The emerging logic is marked by a lack of specification of institutional prescriptions which leads to a high level of ambiguity and uncertainty (Greenwood et al., 2011) challenging managerial practices. Bertels and Lawrence (2016) show that the context of emerging logic leads to specific organizational responses. Beyond the identification of organizational responses, we seek to understand how actors intentionally introduce an emergent and weakly articulated logic and how other actors in the same organization react. To do so, we mobilize the institutional work and materiality approach to understand such practices in a context of emerging logic. The institutional work approach helps to understand these efforts by focusing on the intentional practices of individuals and organizations to create, maintain or disrupt institutions (Lawrence and Suddaby, 2006). The material dimension3 of institutional work seems particularly effective in shaping emerging logics (Cloutier and Langley, 2013), but remains understudied in existing literature (Lawrence and Phillips, 2019). In this sense, we aim to better understand how actors use materiality as a "tool of institutional work" to induce change for co-creation practices in their institutions (Lawrence et al., 2013). Method: We used an exploratory and experimental research design based on a qualitative single-case study approach (Yin, 2015). The case study is a French municipality, and the experiment consisted of both developing a theoretical knowledge base to gain an understanding of the organization and the local context, as well as working with the municipality to design and implement co-creation experiments. The data collection combines a study of semi-structured interviews (one key political actor and five public managers within the municipality); participant and non-participant observation (an informal first encounter, three preparatory meetings, a day of training and two co-creation workshops) and secondary data. Analysis: The data has been analyzed thematically (Miles and Huberman, 2003). Our analysis included two steps: firstly, retracing the history of the case through the identification of the phases of institutional work. Secondly, identifying the logics at play, the forms of materiality and its roles in the institutional work practices. This allowed us to develop the data structure and identify patterns, linking the logics to elements of materiality and institutional work. Main findings: The results of the case study show that materiality is a medium of instantiation both for the emerging logic targeted by institutional work practices and for the logics present within the organization. Based on our findings, materiality is an enacting medium for the emerging logic, a revealing medium for dominant logics, and a confronting medium between the dominant and emerging logics. From a managerial perspective, our study emphasizes the strategic role of materiality in institutional change processes. While little attention is paid to material elements by both managers and neo-institutional scholars, our findings allow us to shed light on their roles.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurine Basse & Magdalena Potz & Anaïs Saint Jonsson & Sarah Serval & Bruno Tiberghien, 2023. "The emergence of cocreation logics within public administration: Roles of materiality in institutional work," Post-Print hal-04106437, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04106437
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04106437v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04106437v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04106437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.