IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04102391.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why Do Consumers Respond Negatively To Brand Activism Campaigns ? An Investigation Into The Perceived Corporate Motives

Author

Listed:
  • Charlotte Lécuyer

    (Université de Lyon)

  • Marine Kergoat

    (UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne)

  • Christine Lambey-Checchin

    (CleRMa - Clermont Recherche Management - ESC Clermont-Ferrand - École Supérieure de Commerce (ESC) - Clermont-Ferrand - UCA [2017-2020] - Université Clermont Auvergne [2017-2020])

Abstract

This research investigates the corporate motives consumers attribute to brand activism campaigns. In two studies, we examine why brand activism adverts generate negative outcomes (which are attitude toward the ad and purchase intentions) through the mediating role of corporate motives. Firstly, a qualitative study shows that consumers associate brand activism with two main corporate motives: moral (altruistic) and instrumental (profit-making) motives. Secondly, a 2 (message type: activism vs. no activism) x 2 (brand: Burger King vs. Audi) between-subjects design, confirms that brand activism adverts lead to lower attitude towards the ad and lower purchase intentions. Brands should be careful when using brand activism messages in their advertising as consumers associate these messages with both profit-making and egoistic motives.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlotte Lécuyer & Marine Kergoat & Christine Lambey-Checchin, 2023. "Why Do Consumers Respond Negatively To Brand Activism Campaigns ? An Investigation Into The Perceived Corporate Motives," Post-Print hal-04102391, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04102391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04102391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.