IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04040348.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Artificial intelligence-based group decision making to improve knowledge transfer: the case of distance learning in higher education

Author

Listed:
  • Inès Saad

    (ESC Amiens, MIS - Modélisation, Information et Systèmes - UR UPJV 4290 - UPJV - Université de Picardie Jules Verne)

  • Thierno Tounkara

    (LITEM - Laboratoire en Innovation, Technologies, Economie et Management (EA 7363) - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - Université Paris-Saclay - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], IMT-BS - TIM - Département Technologies, Information & Management - TEM - Télécom Ecole de Management - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a method based on multicriteria classification and a dominancebased rough set approach (DRSA) to support teachers in decision making. The objective is to use teachers' knowledge and preferences to identify ‘atrisk students', i.e. students who are likely to drop out, and ‘leader students', i.e. students who are likely to help their peers, in distance learning. The proposed method is composed of two phases: phase I builds collective decision rules from teachers' preferences, and phase II classifies students into two decision classes: ‘atrisk students' and ‘leader students'. This method was designed, tested, and validated in higher education, with teachers who have acquired rich experience in teaching in online-synchronous mode since the Covid-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Inès Saad & Thierno Tounkara, 2023. "Artificial intelligence-based group decision making to improve knowledge transfer: the case of distance learning in higher education," Post-Print hal-04040348, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04040348
    DOI: 10.1080/12460125.2022.2161734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04040348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.