Author
Listed:
- Frédéric Grelot
(UMR G-EAU - Gestion de l'Eau, Acteurs, Usages - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - BRGM - Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - AgroParisTech - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement)
- Jean-Stéphane Bailly
(UMR LISAH - Laboratoire d'étude des Interactions Sol - Agrosystème - Hydrosystème - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - AgroParisTech - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement, AgroParisTech)
- David Dorchies
(UMR G-EAU - Gestion de l'Eau, Acteurs, Usages - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - BRGM - Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - AgroParisTech - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement)
Abstract
Annualised average damage (AAD) is a widely used indicator, both in research and in operational use, for two purposes: the evaluation of the flood exposure of a territory and the estimation of the effectiveness of flood prevention policies. The AAD synthesizes rich information resulting from the combination of hydrological (relationship between the rarity and intensity of events), hydraulic (spatial extent and intensity of floods), geographical (location and characteristic of stakes), and vulnerability (potential damage) modelling. By construction, the ADD allows to follow the evolution of hydrology or land use, whether they are due to the evolution of the climate, of the society or to flood prevention policies. As hydraulic modelling is costly to calibrate, in practice, the AAD is usually estimated on the basis of a set of specific flood scenarios. The objective of our presentation is to discuss the influence of the choice of these scenarios (flood sampling) according to the expected use of the AAD (exposure diagnosis vs. project effectiveness). To do so, we build a digital experiment that mime the sampling of floods encountered in practice while keeping full control of the key parameters in the estimation of the AAD. This digital experiment is made up of a stochastic and parametric generator of flood scenarios (hydrograms at floodplain inlets), a Saint-Venant 1.5D-network hydraulic model, whose spatial representation directly arises from a digital terrain model, and a collection of spatially arranged stakes, whose vulnerability is represented in the form of multivariate damage functions (height and duration of submersion). This controlled digital experiment allows the evaluation of various types of policies, alone or combined: diking system, upstream reservoir, adaptation or relocation of the stakes, in a stationary or non-stationary climatic context. Based on the simulation of a 10,000-year chronicle of flood events, we calculate a reference AAD (empirical average as an unbiased estimator of AAD mathematical expectation). This reference allows us to discuss the accuracy of the estimation of the AAD from a set of flood scenarios (sampling effect), and ultimately, the strategies adopted for the choice of flood scenarios (sampling design).
Suggested Citation
Frédéric Grelot & Jean-Stéphane Bailly & David Dorchies, 2022.
"Flood scenarios sampling effect on annualised flood damage estimation,"
Post-Print
hal-04006613, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04006613
DOI: 10.5194/iahs2022-40
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04006613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.