IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03953164.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economics as a science of legislation: Bentham’s analysis of security

Author

Listed:
  • Nathalie Sigot

    (PHARE - Philosophie, Histoire et Analyse des Représentations Économiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)

Abstract

Jeremy Bentham's various writings on economics bear the mark of his being a philosopher of law, as proved by his conception of economics as a "science of legislation". For him, the two fields did not differ in terms of finality: both aimed at maximizing collective happiness. The difference lay in their assigned intermediate objectives: legislation should guarantee "security" and "equality", while political economy should provide "subsistence" and "abundance". Bentham was aware of the existence of potential conflicts between these four intermediate objectives. This led him to rank them in a hierarchy, the highest priority for collective happiness being assigned to security. My paper aims at examining the role played by security in Bentham's approach: it was this objective of security which linked economics and politics. The priority given to security resulted in a pragmatic and nuanced approach to State intervention in economics (section 1). My second section aims at analysing the link between security and laws: indeed, security is a product of legislation, but laws may also be a source of insecurity. Accordingly, Bentham's economic policy prescriptions – what he called the art of economics – resulted from a calculus that combined economic and political arguments, in order to maximize happiness.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie Sigot, 2021. "Economics as a science of legislation: Bentham’s analysis of security," Post-Print hal-03953164, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03953164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03953164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.