IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03940849.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dialogue

Author

Listed:
  • Arnaud Stimec

    (Nantes Univ - Nantes Université)

  • Kevin Levillain

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Blanche Segrestin

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Jacob Dahl Rendtorff

    (Roskilde University)

  • Maria Bonnafous-Boucher

    (Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres)

Abstract

Negotiation and dialogue appear to be at the very core of stakeholder theory (SHT) (Bonnafous-Boucher and Rendtorff, 2016). But there are some severe issues regarding the matter. First, in most related works, negotiation and dialogue are not precisely defined. Second, their effective implementation seems to depend on considerations that are subject to controversies (to what extent stakeholders [SHs] need to be included). Third, the processes of implementation remain a sort of black box (how a genuine dialogue is attained and what are the effects of specific processes). These three issues contribute to a lack of precision regarding SH dialogue. We believe that the new forms of corporations, which may be named "profit-with-purpose companies" (PPCs), offer new prospects about SH dialogue (and negotiation).

Suggested Citation

  • Arnaud Stimec & Kevin Levillain & Blanche Segrestin & Jacob Dahl Rendtorff & Maria Bonnafous-Boucher, 2023. "Dialogue," Post-Print hal-03940849, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03940849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03940849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.