IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03934865.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Structuring ontologies in a context of collaborative system modelling
[Structuration des ontologies dans un contexte de modélisation collaborative des systèmes]

Author

Listed:
  • Romy Lynn Chaib

    (INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Rallou Thomopoulos

    (INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Catherine Macombe

    (INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

Abstract

Prospective studies require discussing and collaborating with the stakeholders to create scenarios of the possible evolution of the studied value-chain. However, stakeholders don't always use the same words when referring to one idea. Constructing an ontology and homogenizing vocabularies is thus crucial to identify key variables which serve in the construction of the needed scenarios. Nevertheless, it is a very complex and timeconsuming task. In this paper we present the method we used to manually build ontologies adapted to the needs of two complementary system-analysis models (namely the "Godet" and the "MyChoice" models), starting from interviews of the agri-food system's stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Romy Lynn Chaib & Rallou Thomopoulos & Catherine Macombe, 2021. "Structuring ontologies in a context of collaborative system modelling [Structuration des ontologies dans un contexte de modélisation collaborative des systèmes]," Post-Print hal-03934865, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03934865
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03934865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03934865/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ontology; Multicriteria argumentation; Prospective; Collaborative modelling; Godet method; MyChoice tool;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03934865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.