IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03831242.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Money as a coordinating device of a commodity economy: old and new, Russian and French readings of Marx
[La monnaie comme dispositif de coordination d'une économie marchande décentralisée. Lectures actuelles et anciennes, françaises et russes de Marx. Partie 1, Théorie monétaire de la valeur]

Author

Listed:
  • Nikolay Nenovsky

    (CRIISEA - Centre de Recherche sur les Institutions, l'Industrie et les Systèmes Économiques d'Amiens - UR UPJV 3908 - UPJV - Université de Picardie Jules Verne)

Abstract

We focus on some original approaches so as to find a solution to the "coordination problem" of the decentralised commodity economy in the different interpretations (and refutations) of Marx, stressing the central role of money. We reconstruct in a comparative perspective the approaches of two contemporary French scholars, Jean Cartelier and André Orléan and of two Russian economists, Isaak Rubin and Peter Struve who worked in the beginning of the last century. Our reconstruction starts with Marx although other approaches are also possible. Each of the four scholars under review offered his own methods of solving the issue of coordination. Although the ideas of the four authors intertwined, we can differentiate between two pairs namely Rubin/Orléan (part 1) and Struve/Cartelier (part 2). This corresponds to the radicality of their analytical solutions. While the former pair upheld the theory of value (each one in his own way), the latter actually eliminated it (again each one in his own way).

Suggested Citation

  • Nikolay Nenovsky, 2019. "Money as a coordinating device of a commodity economy: old and new, Russian and French readings of Marx [La monnaie comme dispositif de coordination d'une économie marchande décentralisée. Lectures," Post-Print hal-03831242, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03831242
    DOI: 10.4000/regulation.15916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nikolay Nenovsky, 2020. "The Theory of the Emission Economy Bolshevik roots of "Modern Monetary Theory"," Working Papers hal-04084551, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03831242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.