IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03782320.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic valuation of preventing fatal and serious road injuries. Results of a Willingness-To-Pay study in four European countries

Author

Listed:
  • Annelies Schoeters

    (Vias Institute - parent)

  • Maxime Large

    (UMRESTTE UMR_T9405 - Unité Mixte de Recherche Epidémiologique et de Surveillance Transport Travail Environnement - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon - Université Gustave Eiffel)

  • Martin Koning

    (AME-SPLOTT - Systèmes Productifs, Logistique, Organisation des Transports et Travail - Université Gustave Eiffel)

  • Laurent Carnis

    (AME-DEST - Dynamiques Economiques et Sociales des Transports - Université Gustave Eiffel)

  • Stjin Daniels

    (Vias Institute - parent)

  • Dominique Mignot

    (TS2 - Département Transport, Santé, Sécurité - Université de Lyon - Université Gustave Eiffel)

  • Raschid Urmeew

    (BASt - Federal Highway Research Institute - BASt)

  • Wim Wijnen

    (W2Economics - parent)

  • Frits Bijleveld

    (SWOV - Institute for Road Safety Research - SWOV - Institute for Road Safety Research)

  • Martin van der Horst

    (Netherlands Institute for Transport Policy Analysis - parent)

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a stated choice study for estimating the Willingness-To-Pay of respondents in four European countries (Belgium, France, Germany and the Netherlands) to reduce the risk of fatal and serious injuries in road crashes. Respondents were confronted with hypothetical route choices that differ in respect of travel costs, travel time and crash risk. The survey was completed by 8,002 respondents, equally spread over the four participating countries and representative for each country with regards to gender, age and region. Possible biases caused by problematic choice behaviour such as inconsistent, irrational or lexicographic answers were addressed. The resulting values were estimated by means of a mixed logit model allowing to account for the panel nature of the data. The Value of a Statistical Life (VSL) was estimated at 6.2 Mill EUR, the Value of a Statistical Serious Injury (VSSI) at 950,000 EUR, and the Value of Time (VoT) at 16.1 EUR/h. Consequently, the relative value of avoiding a fatal injury is estimated to be around 7 times higher than the value of an avoided serious injury. The study revealed differences between countries with France showing values that are significantly lower than the average and Germany showing values that are significantly higher. The estimated VSL values are considerably higher than the values currently used in the four countries, but they are within the range of values found in similar stated choice studies. The results can be used as an input in a broad range of socioeconomic studies including cost-benefit analysis and assessments of socioeconomic costs of road crashes.

Suggested Citation

  • Annelies Schoeters & Maxime Large & Martin Koning & Laurent Carnis & Stjin Daniels & Dominique Mignot & Raschid Urmeew & Wim Wijnen & Frits Bijleveld & Martin van der Horst, 2022. "Economic valuation of preventing fatal and serious road injuries. Results of a Willingness-To-Pay study in four European countries," Post-Print hal-03782320, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03782320
    DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106705
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03782320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.