IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03726465.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bark Beetle Outbreaks in Europe: State of Knowledge and Ways Forward for Management

Author

Listed:
  • Tomáš Hlásny

    (Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences - CZU - Czech University of Life Sciences Prague)

  • Louis König

    (WUR - Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen])

  • Paal Krokene

    (NIBIO - Norsk institutt for bioøkonomi=Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research)

  • Marcus Lindner

    (EFI - European Forest Institute)

  • Claire Montagné-Huck

    (BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Jörg Müller

    (JMU - Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg = University of Würzburg)

  • Hua Qin

    (Mizzou - University of Missouri [Columbia] - University of Missouri System)

  • Kenneth Raffa

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison)

  • Mart-Jan Schelhaas

    (WUR - Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen])

  • Miroslav Svoboda

    (CZU - Czech University of Life Sciences Prague)

  • Heli Viiri

    (LUKE - Natural Resources Institute Finland)

  • Rupert Seidl

    (TUM - Technische Universität Munchen - Technical University Munich - Université Technique de Munich, National Park of Berchtesgaden - Partenaires INRAE)

Abstract

Purpose of Review Outbreaks of tree-killing bark beetles have reached unprecedented levels in conifer forests in the northern hemisphere and are expected to further intensify due to climate change. In parts of Europe, bark beetle outbreaks and efforts to manage them have even triggered social unrests and political instability. These events have increasingly challenged traditional responses to outbreaks, and highlight the need for a more comprehensive management framework. Recent Findings Several synthesis papers on different aspects of bark beetle ecology and management exist. However, our understanding of outbreak drivers and impacts, principles of ecosystem management, governance, and the role of climate change in the dynamics of ecological and social systems has rapidly advanced in recent years. These advances are suggesting a reconsideration of previous management strategies. We synthesize the state of knowledge on drivers and impacts of bark beetle outbreaks in Europe and propose a comprehensive context-dependent framework for their management. We illustrate our ideas for two contrasting societal objectives that represent the end-members of a continuum of forest management goals: wood and biomass production and the conservation of biodiversity and natural processes. For production forests, we propose a management approach addressing economic, social, ecological, infrastructural, and legislative aspects of bark beetle disturbances. In conservation forests, where non-intervention is the default option, we elaborate under which circumstances an active intervention is necessary, and whether such an intervention is in conflict with the objective to conserve biodiversity. Our approach revises the current management response to bark beetles in Europe and promotes an interdisciplinary social-ecological approach to dealing with disturbances.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomáš Hlásny & Louis König & Paal Krokene & Marcus Lindner & Claire Montagné-Huck & Jörg Müller & Hua Qin & Kenneth Raffa & Mart-Jan Schelhaas & Miroslav Svoboda & Heli Viiri & Rupert Seidl, 2021. "Bark Beetle Outbreaks in Europe: State of Knowledge and Ways Forward for Management," Post-Print hal-03726465, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03726465
    DOI: 10.1007/s40725-021-00142-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roitsch, Dennis & Abruscato, Silvia & Lovrić, Marko & Lindner, Marcus & Orazio, Christophe & Winkel, Georg, 2023. "Close-to-nature forestry and intensive forestry – Two response patterns of forestry professionals towards climate change adaptation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Nikinmaa, Laura & de Koning, Johannes H.C. & Derks, Jakob & Grabska-Szwagrzyk, Ewa & Konczal, Agata A. & Lindner, Marcus & Socha, Jarosław & Muys, Bart, 2024. "The priorities in managing forest disturbances to enhance forest resilience: A comparison of a literature analysis and perceptions of forest professionals," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03726465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.