IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03673966.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Hedging Dow Jones Islamic and conventional emerging market indices with CDS, oil, gold and the VSTOXX: A comparison between DCC, ADCC and GO-GARCH models & nbsp;

Author

Listed:
  • Nejib Hachicha

    (FSEG Sfax - Faculté des Sciences Economiques et de Gestion de Sfax - Université de Sfax - University of Sfax)

  • Ahmed Ghorbel

    (Université de Sfax - University of Sfax)

  • Mohamed Chiheb Feki
  • Sofiane Tahi

    (LEFMI - Laboratoire d’Économie, Finance, Management et Innovation - UR UPJV 4286 - UPJV - Université de Picardie Jules Verne)

  • Fredj Amine Dammak

Abstract

Our goal in this paper is to examine the time-varying optimal hedging ratios for the Dow Jones Islamic and conventional emerging stock market indices, hedged with oil, gold, and the VSTOXX as well as four emerging-country sectoral CDS indices (raw materials, industry, health care, and telecommunications). Using a rolling-window procedure with daily data, for the period from January 2000 to April 2019, along with, DCC, ADCC and GO-GARCH models as well as a hedging effectiveness criterion, we determine the best hedging instrument(s). Our findings prove that CDS indices are the best hedging instruments for both Islamic and conventional portfolios, as they have the highest hedging effectiveness. Our empirical results are robust to distribution assumptions and to the use of three MGARCH models in examining different refits (20, 40, and 60 days). Copyright (C)& nbsp;2021, Borsa _Istanbul Anonim S , irketi. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.& nbsp;

Suggested Citation

  • Nejib Hachicha & Ahmed Ghorbel & Mohamed Chiheb Feki & Sofiane Tahi & Fredj Amine Dammak, 2022. "Hedging Dow Jones Islamic and conventional emerging market indices with CDS, oil, gold and the VSTOXX: A comparison between DCC, ADCC and GO-GARCH models & nbsp;," Post-Print hal-03673966, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03673966
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bir.2021.04.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03673966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.