Author
Listed:
- Christine Chauvin
(Lab-STICC_FHOOX - Equipe Human and Organizational Factors and autOmatic in compleX systems - Lab-STICC - Laboratoire des sciences et techniques de l'information, de la communication et de la connaissance - ENIB - École Nationale d'Ingénieurs de Brest - UBS - Université de Bretagne Sud - UBO - Université de Brest - ENSTA Bretagne - École Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées Bretagne - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UBL - Université Bretagne Loire - IMT Atlantique - IMT Atlantique - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])
- Tabatha Thiébaut-Rizzoni
(Lab-STICC_FHOOX - Equipe Human and Organizational Factors and autOmatic in compleX systems - Lab-STICC - Laboratoire des sciences et techniques de l'information, de la communication et de la connaissance - ENIB - École Nationale d'Ingénieurs de Brest - UBS - Université de Bretagne Sud - UBO - Université de Brest - ENSTA Bretagne - École Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées Bretagne - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UBL - Université Bretagne Loire - IMT Atlantique - IMT Atlantique - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])
- Jean-Pierre Clostermann
(Lab-STICC_FHOOX - Equipe Human and Organizational Factors and autOmatic in compleX systems - Lab-STICC - Laboratoire des sciences et techniques de l'information, de la communication et de la connaissance - ENIB - École Nationale d'Ingénieurs de Brest - UBS - Université de Bretagne Sud - UBO - Université de Brest - ENSTA Bretagne - École Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées Bretagne - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UBL - Université Bretagne Loire - IMT Atlantique - IMT Atlantique - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])
- Philippe Rauffet
(CROSSING - FrenCh austRalian labOratory for humanS/autonomouS agents teamING - University of South Australia [Adelaide] - University of Adelaide - Flinders University [Adelaide, Australia] - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Naval Group, Lab-STICC_FHOOX - Equipe Human and Organizational Factors and autOmatic in compleX systems - Lab-STICC - Laboratoire des sciences et techniques de l'information, de la communication et de la connaissance - ENIB - École Nationale d'Ingénieurs de Brest - UBS - Université de Bretagne Sud - UBO - Université de Brest - ENSTA Bretagne - École Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées Bretagne - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UBL - Université Bretagne Loire - IMT Atlantique - IMT Atlantique - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])
Abstract
Piloting a vessel is a highly cooperative activity in which communication between pilots and masters is an essential safety factor. This study uses the notion of common frame of reference (COFOR) to investigate cooperation between pilots and masters, using the verbal exchanges recorded on board 12 vessels navigating on the river Seine in 11 standard situations and 1 incident situation. These situations involved eight of the 53 pilots employed by the Seine pilotage station. The recorded exchanges were broken down into "communication loops". Each communication loop was coded in relation to four dimensions (sender, type and object of the first message, type of loop). The data analysis seeks to compare the prescribed task (i.e., the task as defined by International Maritime Organization resolutions) and the actual activity of pilots and masters. We show that the pilot is the one who initiates the vast majority of the communication loops. Typically, the pilot provides information regarding the plan and the situation (traffic, visibility, current) and requests the information he needs and that is related to the vessel characteristics. Furthermore, the plan is shared only at a tactical level. In standard situations, the strategic elements of the plan (i.e., defined course and speed for each leg of the passage) are not shared. This study draws attention to the asymmetrical cooperative activities in which pilots are the main initiators of communications. It calls into question the design of navigation tools for confined waters, which could facilitate the creation and the maintenance of a COFOR.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03536521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.