IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03416448.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La sélectivité de la protection sociale : débats et enjeux

Author

Listed:
  • Rejane Hugounenq-de Vreyer

    (OFCE - Observatoire français des conjonctures économiques (Sciences Po) - Sciences Po - Sciences Po)

  • Henri Sterdyniak

    (OFCE - Observatoire français des conjonctures économiques (Sciences Po) - Sciences Po - Sciences Po)

Abstract

Compte tenu des difficultés récurrentes de financement de la protection sociale, ne convient-il pas d'affirmer des choix et des priorités, en réorientant par exemple les efforts vers la protection des plus démunis ? Certains ont pu mettre en avant cet objectif en préconisant l'accroissement des prestations sous conditions de ressources, c'est-à-dire versées aux ménages dont les revenus demeurent inférieurs à un certain seuil. Cet article présente les principaux enjeux de cette question en examinant les logiques redistributives à l'œuvre dans le système actuel de protection sociale. Il souligne en particulier le danger de rompre le consensus existant aujourd'hui en matière de contributions, certains pouvant refuser à l'avenir de financer un système dont ils ne bénéficieraient plus.

Suggested Citation

  • Rejane Hugounenq-de Vreyer & Henri Sterdyniak, 1999. "La sélectivité de la protection sociale : débats et enjeux," Post-Print hal-03416448, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03416448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03416448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.