Author
Listed:
- Joëlle Lighezzolo-Alnot
(INTERPSY - Laboratoire de psychologie de l'interaction et des relations intersubjectives - UL - Université de Lorraine)
- Romain Pierronnet
(IRG - Institut de Recherche en Gestion - UPEC UP12 - Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 - Université Gustave Eiffel)
- Caroline Strube
(CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
- Catherine Tessier
(ONERA, Université de Toulouse [Toulouse] - ONERA - PRES Université de Toulouse)
- Nathalie Théret
(Irset - Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail - UA - Université d'Angers - UR - Université de Rennes - EHESP - École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique [EHESP] - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale - Biosit : Biologie - Santé - Innovation Technologique - Structure Fédérative de Recherche en Biologie et Santé de Rennes)
Abstract
In France, the ministerial decree on doctoral studies issued in 2016 stipulates that "doctoral schools must ensure that each doctoral student receives training in research ethics and research integrity". More than three years later, it has seemed relevant to draw up a sufficiently exhaustive map of research ethics and research integrity trainings and specific programs, in order to better identify and improve them. To this end, a working group involving members of the French network of research integrity officers and of the French doctoral schools network, together with the French office for research integrity has designed an online survey that was sent to all the French higher education and research institutions, research integrity officers, and doctoral schools in late 2019. 109 responses were collected at the end of January 2020. For this presentation to an international audience, we have chosen to limit the sample analysis to the 51 universities having completed the survey. As a main result, the survey shows that 94% of the 51 responding universities have implemented research ethics and research integrity training initiatives, which confirms that these educational programs are now widely deployed. There are various teaching approaches and modes of delivery including lectures (73%), small group seminars (52%), local online trainings / massive online open courses (50%) and practical workshops (42%). In addition, the survey highlights the contents addressed during these training sessions. Topics such as best and bad research practices, authorship and links / conflicts of interest are dealt with in more than 75% of the 48 universities providing trainings, while topics such as alert procedures, peer review practices and research responsibility issues are less frequently focused on.
Suggested Citation
Joëlle Lighezzolo-Alnot & Romain Pierronnet & Caroline Strube & Catherine Tessier & Nathalie Théret, 2021.
"Research Ethics and Integrity trainings for doctoral students in France: a national overview,"
Post-Print
hal-03409095, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03409095
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03409095. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.