IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03358699.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Did those executed in World War One die in the name of their pacifist ideas ?
[Les fusillés de la Grande Guerre sont-ils morts au nom de leurs idées pacifistes ? Une approche quantitative]

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Guillot

    (CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Antoine Parent

    (UP8 - Université Paris 8 Vincennes-Saint-Denis)

Abstract

This article explores the issue of the executions of French soldiers during the Great War from a quantitative perspective. Using the Ministry of Defense's database of the "Fusillés de la Première Guerre mondiale", we first describe the characteristics of these soldiers who were sentenced to death by a council of war or summarily executed, and examine whether the profile of the executed changed over the war years. This statistical portrait is then completed by two analyses conducted with the help of regression models. The first focuses on the temporal distribution of executions. In particular, we seek to determine whether variations in the number of executions from one month to the next are related to variations in the intensity of the fighting. The second analysis seeks to explain differences between French départements in the proportion of soldiers executed. Two main findings emerge from our study. First, the profile of the soldiers shot in 1914 was quite different from that of the soldiers who were executed in the following years: they were more often farmers, serving in the infantry, with no criminal record. On the other hand, the soldiers shot in 1917, a year of mutinies, did not differ much in their characteristics from those shot in 1916. Second, the results of our regressions suggest that the vast majority of the executed soldiers were "poilus" ["grunts"] like others who found themselves facing a firing squad for having committed a fault in a moment of weakness, often after having taken part in particularly violent fighting. Their actions were probably, in most cases, motivated more by the instinct of survival than by pacifist ideas or other political considerations.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Guillot & Antoine Parent, 2021. "Did those executed in World War One die in the name of their pacifist ideas ? [Les fusillés de la Grande Guerre sont-ils morts au nom de leurs idées pacifistes ? Une approche quantitative]," Post-Print hal-03358699, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03358699
    DOI: 10.3917/reof.171.0135
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03358699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03358699/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3917/reof.171.0135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dora L. Costa & Matthew E. Kahn, 2003. "Cowards and Heroes: Group Loyalty in the American Civil War," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(2), pages 519-548.
    2. Olivier Guillot & Antoine Parent, 2018. "« Adieu la vie, adieu l’amour » : analyse des inégalités de temps de survie chez les soldats « Morts pour la France » durant la Grande Guerre," Population (french edition), Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED), vol. 73(3), pages 433-465.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Londregan, John & Vindigni, Andrea, 2006. "Voting as a Credible Threat," Papers 10-04-2006, Princeton University, Research Program in Political Economy.
    2. Jeremy Foltz & Bradford Barham & Jean-Paul Chavas & Kwansoo Kim, 2012. "Efficiency and technological change at US research universities," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 171-186, April.
    3. Seals, Richard Alan & Stern, Liliana V., 2013. "Cognitive ability and the division of labor in urban ghettos: Evidence from gang activity in U.S. data," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 140-149.
    4. Borghans, L. & Golsteyn, B.H.H., 2007. "Are courses chosen to reduce skill-deficiencies? an experimental approach," ROA Research Memorandum 001, Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA).
    5. Aureo de Paula, 2004. "Social Interactions in a Synchronization Game," Econometric Society 2004 Latin American Meetings 277, Econometric Society.
    6. Lex Borghans & Bas ter Weel & Bruce A. Weinberg, 2008. "Interpersonal Styles and Labor Market Outcomes," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 43(4).
    7. Durlauf, Steven N. & Fafchamps, Marcel, 2005. "Social Capital," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 26, pages 1639-1699, Elsevier.
    8. Coppier, Raffaella & Sabatini, Fabio & Sodini, Mauro, 2021. "Social Capital, Human Capital, And Fertility," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(3), pages 632-650, April.
    9. Marius Mehrl, 2023. "Female combatants and rebel group behaviour: Evidence from Nepal," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(3), pages 260-280, May.
    10. Alberto Alesina & Bryony Reich & Alessandro Riboni, 2017. "Nation-Building, Nationalism and Wars," NBER Working Papers 23435, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Bauer, Michal & Cahlíková, Jana & Celik Katreniak, Dagmara & Chytilová, Julie & Cingl, Lubomir & Želinský, Tomáš, 2018. "Anti-Social Behavior in Groups," IZA Discussion Papers 11944, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Leonardo Becchetti & Luca Corazzini & Vittorio Pelligra, 2021. "Trust and Trustworthiness in Corrupted Economic Environments," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, February.
    13. Philip Keefer & Stephen Knack, 2008. "Social Capital, Social Norms and the New Institutional Economics," Springer Books, in: Claude Ménard & Mary M. Shirley (ed.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, chapter 27, pages 701-725, Springer.
    14. John Londregan & Andrea Vindigni, 2006. "Voting as a Credible Threat," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 18, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    15. Geraci, Andrea & Nardotto, Mattia & Reggiani, Tommaso & Sabatini, Fabio, 2022. "Broadband Internet and social capital," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    16. Christian Dippel & Stephan Heblich, 2021. "Leadership in Social Movements: Evidence from the "Forty-Eighters" in the Civil War," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(2), pages 472-505, February.
    17. Jennifer M. Mellor & Jeffrey Milyo, 2003. "State Social Capital and Individual Health Status," Working Papers 0310, Harris School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago.
    18. Gallus, Jana & Reiff, Joseph & Kamenica, Emir & Fiske, Alan Page, 2021. "Relational Incentives Theory," MPRA Paper 109898, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Edward Glaeser & Giacomo Ponzetto & Andrei Shleifer, 2007. "Why does democracy need education?," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 77-99, June.
    20. Marcel Fafchamps & Alexander Moradi, 2015. "Referral and Job Performance: Evidence from the Ghana Colonial Army," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 63(4), pages 715-751.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Executed soldiers; First World War; French army; Military history; Fusillés; Première Guerre mondiale; Armée française; Histoire militaire;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03358699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.