IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03350523.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Le développement de la validation des acquis de l'expérience (VAE) à l'université : quels défis, quels bénéficiaires ?

Author

Listed:
  • Nathalie Havet

    (SAF - Laboratoire de Sciences Actuarielle et Financière - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon)

  • Caroline Bayart

    (SAF - Laboratoire de Sciences Actuarielle et Financière - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon)

  • Nicolas Lenne

    (UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon)

Abstract

Initially implemented for people with few or no diplomas, the accreditation of prior experiential learning (APEL) has considerably changed since 2002. Although this way to get a degree is still modest in French universities, its implications for the development of lifelong learning are significant. In this context, our article examines APEL patterns at the university. It tries to find out if the paths of candidates applying for APEL procedure at the university have specificities compared to other APEL paths, in terms of admissibility, drop-out and validation. Econometric analysis, carried out on longitudinal administrative data of APEL candidates in a major French university between 2009 and 2018, show that APEL at the university differs in several ways: the profile of candidates, the stages at which the selection or self-selection of candidates is carried out, and the determinants of the jury’s validation decisions, whether they concern individual characteristics or diploma.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie Havet & Caroline Bayart & Nicolas Lenne, 2021. "Le développement de la validation des acquis de l'expérience (VAE) à l'université : quels défis, quels bénéficiaires ?," Post-Print hal-03350523, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03350523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03350523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.