IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03319858.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparison of two estimation methods based on the FADN
[Comparaison de deux méthodes d'estimation sur la base du RICA]

Author

Listed:
  • Dominique Desbois

    (ECO-PUB - Economie Publique - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - AgroParisTech)

Abstract

The microeconomic analysis of agricultural production costs, whether retrospective or prospective, is a tool for analysing net margins, and thus makes it possible to assess is a tool for analysing net margins, and thus makes it possible to assess the competitiveness of farmers, one of the farmers, one of the major elements in the development or maintenance of agri-food sectors in European in European regions. This paper compares two methods of estimating agricultural production costs from microeconomic data of the Farm Accountancy Data Network: the "Seemingly Unrelated Regression" (SUR) method and the "Partial Least Squares" (PLS) method, according to three criteria (the correlation of the estimates, the coefficient of determination, the mean square deviation).

Suggested Citation

  • Dominique Desbois, 2002. "Comparison of two estimation methods based on the FADN [Comparaison de deux méthodes d'estimation sur la base du RICA]," Post-Print hal-03319858, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03319858
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03319858
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03319858/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03319858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.