IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03298796.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cyber security management of critical energy infrastructure in national cybersecurity strategies: cases of USA, UK, France, Estonia and Lithuania

Author

Listed:
  • Manuela Tvaronavičienė

    (Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Daugavpils University)

  • Tomas Plėta

    (Vilnius Gediminas Technical University)

  • Silvia Della Casa

    (NATO Energy Security Centre of Excellence)

  • Juozas Latvys

    (NATO Energy Security Centre of Excellence)

Abstract

The progresses made in terms of cybersecurity in these past years have been huge, and the implementation of newer strategies has brought interesting results all over the globe. However, the full implementation of cybersecurity presents a challenge to a lot of countries, especially if considered the Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP), which is still one of the areas with the most gaps in terms of cybersecurity. In this article, the first five countries by cybersecurity level according to the Global Cybersecurity Index (GCI) 2018, in order UK, USA, France, Estonia and Lithuania, will be evaluated for their solutions in terms of Critical Infrastructure Protection. The results will show the effective accuracy of the index and will shed light on the various approaches to Critical Infrastructure Protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Tomas Plėta & Silvia Della Casa & Juozas Latvys, 2020. "Cyber security management of critical energy infrastructure in national cybersecurity strategies: cases of USA, UK, France, Estonia and Lithuania," Post-Print hal-03298796, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03298796
    DOI: 10.9770/ird.2020.2.4(6)
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03298796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03298796/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/ird.2020.2.4(6)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Taqwa Hariguna & Athapol Ruangkanjanases & Sarmini, 2021. "Public Behavior as an Output of E-Government Service: The Role of New Technology Integrated in E-Government and Antecedent of Relationship Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Aneta Wysokińśka-Senkus & Justyna Górna, 2021. "Towards sustainable development: risk management for organizational security," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(3), pages 527-544, March.
    3. Shahin Bayramov & Iurii Prokazov & Sergey Kondrashev & Jan Kowalik, 2021. "Household Electricity Generation as a Way of Energy Independence of States—Social Context of Energy Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Marko Milojević & Mariusz Urbański & Ivica Terzić & Valeriy Prasolov, 2020. "Impact of Non-Financial Factors on the Effectiveness of Audits in Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Wadim Strielkowski & Lubomír Civín & Elena Tarkhanova & Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Yelena Petrenko, 2021. "Renewable Energy in the Sustainable Development of Electrical Power Sector: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Antonín Korauš & Lucia Kurilovská & Patrícia Krásná & Miroslav Gombár & Patrik Javorčík, 2024. "Perception of hybrid threats by students of selected universities and building effective resistance against their effects," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 11(3), pages 358-374, March.
    7. Nadine Bachmann & Shailesh Tripathi & Manuel Brunner & Herbert Jodlbauer, 2022. "The Contribution of Data-Driven Technologies in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-33, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cybersecurity; critical infrastructure protection; management; energy security; cyber attack;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03298796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.