Author
Abstract
Introduction: Resource allocation at a local level involves making difficult decisions about investment and, particularly in a time of economic stringency, about disinvestment. These complex decisions are influenced by a number of local, political and contextual factors. The use of MCDA can support the local decision-makers to allocate their resources in a rational manner, based on explicit consideration of their priorities. Overview: This chapter provides an overview of methods for decision-making of relevance to health priority setting in local authorities. These methods have typically been developed in health-care independent of MCDA but share a number of similarities. Priority-setting approaches which draw on MCDA techniques include option appraisal, Portsmouth scorecard, prioritisation matrices, programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA), sociotechnical allocation of resources (Star) and discrete choice experiments (DCEs). Whilst these applications are all based on MCDA, they vary significantly in terms of scientific rigour, robustness and time and other resources required. Case Study: The case study (entitled SYMPLE) describes the MCDA approach used to inform a prioritisation process for smoking cessation interventions across four local government areas in South Yorkshire. Discussion: A number of MCDA methods exist for local resource allocation, ranging from quick and simple methods (e.g. direct methods) which can be performed in a couple of weeks and are based on subjective opinion to more complex methods like the HELP tool which was based on DCEs and robust evidence (systematic reviews, modelling and survey of general population) but took significantly longer to implement. The local decision-makers need to choose the appropriate method based on their resource/time constraints, scientific validity and significance and broader context of the decision problem.
Suggested Citation
Brian Reddy & Praveen Thokala & Alejandra Duenas, 2017.
"MCDA for Resource Allocation at a Local Level: An Application in the UK,"
Post-Print
hal-03272844, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03272844
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47540-0_10
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03272844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.