IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03138401.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Long-term work outcomes and the efficacy of multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs on labor force participation in cancer patients - a protocol for a longitudinal prospective cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Harald Engan

    (Unicare Rehabilitation)

  • Line Oldervoll

    (NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology [Trondheim] - NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology)

  • Gro Bertheussen

    (St. Olav's University Hospital - St. Olavs Hospital HF)

  • Martine Gaarder

    (St. Olav's University Hospital - St. Olavs Hospital HF)

  • Roy Nielsen

    (Fafo Institute for Labour and Social Research)

  • Alain Paraponaris

    (AMSE - Aix-Marseille Sciences Economiques - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - ECM - École Centrale de Marseille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, ORS PACA - Observatoire régional de la santé Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur [Marseille])

  • Guro Stene

    (NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology [Trondheim] - NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology)

  • Jon Sandmæl

    (Unicare Rehabilitation)

  • Torgrim Tandstad

    (St. Olav's University Hospital - St. Olavs Hospital HF, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology [Trondheim] - NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology)

  • Steffen Torp

    (USN - University of South-Eastern Norway)

Abstract

Background. Many cancer survivors experience late effects of cancer treatment and therefore struggle to return to work. Norway provides rehabilitation programs to increase labor force participation for cancer survivors after treatment. However, the extent to which such programs affect labor force participation has not been appropriately assessed. This study aims to investigate i) labor force participation, sick leave and disability rates among cancer survivors up to 10 years after being diagnosed with cancer and identify comorbidities contributing to long-term sick leave or disability pensioning; ii) how type of cancer, treatment modalities, employment sectors and financial- and sociodemographic factors may influence labor force participation; iii) how participation in rehabilitation programs among cancer survivor affect the longterm labor force participation, the number of rehospitalizations and incidence of comorbidities. Design and methods. Information from four medical, welfare and occupational registries in Norway will be linked to information from 163,279 cancer cases (15.68 years old) registered in the Norwegian Cancer Registry from 2004 to 2016. The registries provide detailed information on disease characteristics, comorbidities, medical and surgical treatments, occupation, national insurance benefits and demographics over a 10-year period following a diagnosis of cancer. Expected impact of the study for Public Health. The study will provide important information on how treatment, rehabilitation and sociodemographic factors influence labor force participation among cancer survivors. Greater understanding of work-related risk factors and the influence of rehabilitation on work-participation may encourage informed decisions among cancer patients, healthcare and work professionals and service planners.

Suggested Citation

  • Harald Engan & Line Oldervoll & Gro Bertheussen & Martine Gaarder & Roy Nielsen & Alain Paraponaris & Guro Stene & Jon Sandmæl & Torgrim Tandstad & Steffen Torp, 2020. "Long-term work outcomes and the efficacy of multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs on labor force participation in cancer patients - a protocol for a longitudinal prospective cohort study," Post-Print hal-03138401, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03138401
    DOI: 10.4081/jphr.2020.1739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03138401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.