IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02906301.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Preclusive Plea as an Indirect Jurisdiction Institute in Russian Legal Practice: Feasibility Issues
[Преюдициальный Запрос Как Институт Косвенной Юрисдикции В Процессуальном Праве России: Вопросы Целесообразности]

Author

Listed:
  • Anatoliy Kostruba

    (Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University)

Abstract

The article discloses the conditions for the implementation of the procedure for ensuring the right to a fair trial and an effective remedy. The collisional application of legal norms contributes to the deformation of the structural unity of the judicial practice of the application of the norms of national law. It is indicated that the overcoming of this process is the introduction of the institute of the prejudicial inquiry in the procedural law of the Russian Federation. The reference for prejudicial inquiry, is a form of appeal of a court of a certain level of jurisdiction (which by establishing the factual circumstances applies national law) to the competent body of the judicial authority of the national legal system, which revises the judicial acts of the first or appellate instance by way of cassation proceedings, in order to obtain its opinion on the application of the collisional law rule in controversial legal relationships through its delegated interpretation. The types of prejudicial inquiries in the context of international conventions of Russia and the European Union's communitarian law are considered. An analysis of the procedural law of France is made, and suggestions for improving national law are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Anatoliy Kostruba, 2018. "Preclusive Plea as an Indirect Jurisdiction Institute in Russian Legal Practice: Feasibility Issues [Преюдициальный Запрос Как Институт Косвенной Юрисдикции В Процессуальном Праве России: Вопросы Ц," Post-Print hal-02906301, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02906301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02906301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.