IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02860300.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reading the 2019 Court of Auditors Report on the Evaluation of Online Public Services in Morocco
[Lecture croisée dans le rapport de la Cour des comptes de 2019 sur l'évaluation des services publics en ligne au Maroc]

Author

Listed:
  • Karim Zaouaq

    (UH2MC - Université Hassan II [Casablanca])

Abstract

Le recours des administrations marocaines aux technologies de l'information et de la communication a certes évolué à travers les multiples politiques conçues dans ce domaine. Mais, le déploiement institutionnel en faveur de telles exigences numériques a été en deçà des attentes des usagers des services publics. Partant, la Cour des comptes a œuvré à dresser un état des lieux de l'évolution des services publics en ligne, ce qui a débouché sur la publication au cours du mois de mai 2019 d'un rapport qui a établi un diagnostic unique des principaux services publics en ligne offerts au Maroc et les a soumis à une analyse approfondie en termes de gouvernance. Toutefois, les données de ce rapport demeurent incomplètes en raison entre autres de la démarche méthodologique adoptée ainsi que de la prise en compte limitée du taux de satisfaction des parties concernées par les prestations des services publics en ligne.

Suggested Citation

  • Karim Zaouaq, 2020. "Reading the 2019 Court of Auditors Report on the Evaluation of Online Public Services in Morocco [Lecture croisée dans le rapport de la Cour des comptes de 2019 sur l'évaluation des services public," Post-Print hal-02860300, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02860300
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02860300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02860300/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andersen, Thomas Barnebeck, 2009. "E-Government as an anti-corruption strategy," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 201-210, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:zbw:bofitp:2013_009 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Lihua Wang & Xin(Robert) Luo & M. Peter Jurkat, 2022. "Understanding Inconsistent Corruption Control through E-government Participation: Updated Evidence from a Cross-Country Investigation," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 979-1006, September.
    3. Ayse Yigit Sakar & Evren Ayranci, 2014. "Attitudes towards e-Bookkeeping in Turkey: Initial Research," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 4(1), pages 52-66, January.
    4. Rajeev K. Goel & James W. Saunoris, 2017. "Forms of government decentralization and institutional quality: evidence from a large sample of nations," Chapters, in: Naoyuki Yoshino & Peter J. Morgan (ed.), Central and Local Government Relations in Asia, chapter 12, pages 395-420, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Sohag, Kazi & Riad Shams, S.M. & Darusalam, Darusalam & Devalle, Alain, 2021. "Information digitalisation and local institutional agility: evidence from ASEAN countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    6. Ali Acaravci & Seyfettin Artan & Pinar Hayaloglu & Sinan Erdogan, 2023. "Economic and Institutional Determinants of Corruption: The Case of Developed and Developing Countries," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 47(1), pages 207-231, March.
    7. Rajeev K. Goel & Michael A. Nelson, 2014. "Whistleblower laws and exposed corruption in the United States," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(20), pages 2331-2341, July.
    8. Malik Shahzad Shabbir & Hummera Saleem & Muhammad Bilal Khan, 2021. "Impact of Internet Adoption and Mobile Phone Penetration on Corruption: Evidence from Selected Asia-Paciï¬ c Countries," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(4), pages 906-920, August.
    9. Veronika Linhartová, 2019. "Curbing Corruption in the Public Sector by Utilizing Electronic Public Administration," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 67(4), pages 1039-1048.
    10. Singh, Sunny Kumar & Bhattacharya, Kaushik, 2017. "Does easy availability of cash affect corruption? Evidence from a panel of countries," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 236-247.
    11. Jiménez, Alfredo & Hanoteau, Julien & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2022. "E-procurement and firm corruption to secure public contracts: The moderating role of governance institutions and supranational support," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 640-650.
    12. Emery, Thomas & Mélon, Lela & Spruk, Rok, 2023. "Does e-procurement matter for economic growth? Subnational evidence from Australia," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 318-334.
    13. Romero-Martínez, Ana M. & García-Muiña, Fernando E., 2021. "Digitalization level, corruptive practices, and location choice in the hotel industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 176-185.
    14. Jan Hunady, 2017. "Individual and institutional determinants of corruption in the EU countries: the problem of its tolerance," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 34(1), pages 139-157, April.
    15. Liliana Proskuryakova & Gulnara Abdrakhmanova & Hans Pitlik, 2013. "Public sector e-innovations. E-government and its impact on corruption," HSE Working papers WP BRP 04/STI/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    16. Adam, Isabelle & Fazekas, Mihály, 2021. "Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    17. Tofail Alam & Muhammad Aftab & Zaheer Abbas & Kamoliddin Mannonov Murodjon Ugli & Syed Asad Abbas Bokhari, 2023. "Impact of E-Government Initiatives to Combat Corruption Mediating by Behavioral Intention: A Quantitative Analysis from Emerging Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Kanyam, Daniel A. & Kostandini, Genti & Ferreira, Susana, 2017. "The Mobile Phone Revolution: Have Mobile Phones and the Internet Reduced Corruption in Sub-Saharan Africa?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 271-284.
    19. Gustavo de Oliveira Almeida & Deborah Moraes Zouain, 2016. "E-government Impact on Business and Entrepreneurship in High-, Upper-middle- and Lower-income Countries from 2008 to 2014: A Linear Mixed Model Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(4), pages 743-758, August.
    20. Fazlı YILDIZ, & Ersin Nail SAGDIC, & Guner TUNCER, 2017. "Budgetary Transparency, E-Government And Corruption: New Evidence From Panel Data Approach," EcoForum, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 6(1), pages 1-55, January.
    21. Vu, Khuong & Hartley, Kris, 2018. "Promoting smart cities in developing countries: Policy insights from Vietnam," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 845-859.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Services publics en ligne; e-gouvernement; données publiques; interaction; information;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02860300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.