IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02643583.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Consumers' response on the labels of fresh fruits and related implications on pesticide use

Author

Listed:
  • Efthimia Tsakiridou

    (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki)

  • Konstadinos Mattas

    (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki)

  • Pascale Bazoche

    (ALISS - Alimentation et sciences sociales - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

Abstract

The use of labels on fresh fruits have significantly influenced and transformed the fresh produce market over the last decade. While it is well-known from the literature that food labels notably shape consumers' choices and consequently their willingness to pay (WTP) incremental premiums for products with specific attributes, very few studies have paid particular attention to the fresh fruit labels that indicate good production practices and methods. The aim of this article is to evaluate consumers' attitudes toward labels in fresh apples, to examine their WTP for apples with various labels indicating specific production methods, and to reveal the labels' importance in implementing environmentally friendly and healthy production practices. Specifically, factors affecting consumers' choices for specific apple quality attributes are examined in combination with attitudes and beliefs toward the significance of the label, the certification process and the use of pesticides. In order to elicit price premiums for specific labels, the Becker–DeGroot–Marschak (BDM) mechanism was applied, which puts people in an active market environment dealing with real money and products. Based on the revealed price premiums the WTP for apples with a specific label was estimated and the implications of the results for the producers, the market, and policy-making are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Efthimia Tsakiridou & Konstadinos Mattas & Pascale Bazoche, 2012. "Consumers' response on the labels of fresh fruits and related implications on pesticide use," Post-Print hal-02643583, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02643583
    DOI: 10.1080/16507541.2012.695113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02643583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.