IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02480887.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Comparison of Budgeting and Accounting Reforms in the National Governments of France, Germany, the UK and the US

Author

Listed:
  • Rowan Jones
  • Évelyne Lande

    (CEREGE [Poitiers, La Rochelle] - Centre de recherche en gestion [EA 1722] - IAE Poitiers - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - ULR - La Rochelle Université)

  • Klaus Lüder
  • Marine Portal

    (IAE Poitiers - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers)

Abstract

This paper compares technical aspects of accrual‐based budgeting and accounting reforms of the national governments of France, Germany, the UK and the US. It shows that there is no consensus among the four countries about the complete package of technical reform possibilities that is most appropriate; there is also no consensus among the four countries about each one of the possibilities that is most appropriate. What is clear is the resilience of traditional budgetary accounting systems. It is also clear that, in the fundamental context and content of the reforms, the UK is the striking exception.

Suggested Citation

  • Rowan Jones & Évelyne Lande & Klaus Lüder & Marine Portal, 2013. "A Comparison of Budgeting and Accounting Reforms in the National Governments of France, Germany, the UK and the US," Post-Print hal-02480887, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02480887
    DOI: 10.1111/faam.12022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jones Rowan & Caruana Josette, 2014. "A Perspective on the Proposal for European Public Sector Accounting Standards, in the Context of Accruals in UK Government Accounting," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 265-282, December.
    2. Samir El Baz & Frédéric Gautier, 2016. "Budgeting « as practice » in a public agency [Le budget « as practice » dans une agence publique]," Post-Print hal-01900507, HAL.
    3. Newberry Susan, 2014. "The Use of Accrual Accounting in New Zealand’s Central Government: Second Thoughts," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 283-297, December.
    4. Elisha Adeboye & Gbemisola Labisi & Victor Ekere, 2024. "Enhanced Financial Reporting for Unfunded Obligations in the US Economy," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(5), pages 1637-1646, May.
    5. Mussari Riccardo & Sorrentino Daniela, 2017. "Italian Public Sector Accounting Reform: A Step Towards European Public Sector Accounting Harmonisation," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 137-153, July.
    6. Rajat Deb, 2018. "Financial Audit or Forensic Audit? Government Sector Panorama," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 11(2), pages 135-158, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02480887. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.