IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02320427.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do political parties play dirty in the discussion on gender balanced boards? Evidence from Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Olbrich

    (IWP - Institut für Wirtschaftsprüfung (Universität des Saarlandes - Saarland University))

  • Anna E. Nikolis

    (IWP - Institut für Wirtschaftsprüfung (Universität des Saarlandes - Saarland University))

  • David J. Rapp

    (IWP - Institut für Wirtschaftsprüfung (Universität des Saarlandes - Saarland University))

  • Katrin V. Weber

    (IWP - Institut für Wirtschaftsprüfung (Universität des Saarlandes - Saarland University))

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Olbrich & Anna E. Nikolis & David J. Rapp & Katrin V. Weber, 2016. "Do political parties play dirty in the discussion on gender balanced boards? Evidence from Germany," Post-Print hal-02320427, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02320427
    DOI: 10.1007/s41464-016-0017-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Markus Widmann & Florian Follert & Matthias Wolz, 2021. "On the Political Decision of Audit Market Regulation: Empirical Evidence of Audit Firm Tenure and Maximum Durations within the European Union," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-24, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02320427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.