IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02312554.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Idiosyncratic volatility change and event study tests

Author

Listed:
  • Nihat Aktas

    (EM - EMLyon Business School)

  • Eric de Bodt

    (Université Lille Nord (France))

  • Jean-Gabriel Cousin

    (Université de Lille, Université Lille Nord (France))

Abstract

The idiosyncratic volatility is a key input to the standard event-study method. The recent literature has suggested that the idiosyncratic volatility is not stable through time. This paper investigates the extent to which the event-study method is affected by this economic phenomenon. Using both simulation and real dataset analyses, we show that standard event-study methods suffer from a significant loss of power in the presence of increasing idiosyncratic volatility, as intuition would suggest. This affects the comparability of event study results obtained in two different empirical contexts (time periods or geographical zones). Therefore, to compare results between high and low regime of idiosyncratic volatility on a fair ground, everything else being equal, the ratio of the sample sizes needs to be equal to the ratio of the idiosyncratic variances in the two contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Nihat Aktas & Eric de Bodt & Jean-Gabriel Cousin, 2009. "Idiosyncratic volatility change and event study tests," Post-Print hal-02312554, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02312554
    DOI: 10.3917/fina.302.0031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kiseok Nam & Shahriar Khaksari & Moonsoo Kang, 2017. "Trend in aggregate idiosyncratic volatility," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(1), pages 11-28, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02312554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.