IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02311856.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Combining social shaping of technology and communicative action theory for understanding rhetorical closure in IT

Author

Listed:
  • Marlei Pozzebon

    (EM - EMLyon Business School)

  • Ryad Titah
  • Alain Pinsonneault

Abstract

Purpose – Proposes the concept of rhetorical closure to address the phenomenon of pervasive IT "fashions". Suggests that prevailing discourses surrounding IT are dominated by the rhetoric of closure and that such closure, although mutually constructed by suppliers, consultants and managers, has had several adverse consequences in terms of organizational change and results. Stimulates a critical thinking regarding the persistence of successive waves of new IT fashions and the consequences of closure on practice. Design/methodology/approach – Theoretical framework informed by political views within the social shaping school combined with Habermas' theory of communicative action. Illustration of the argument is based on 22 semi-structured interviews (senior practitioners from client-firms, software suppliers and consulting-firms working on ERP projects). Findings – Outlines the nature of the "chain reaction" produced by rhetorical closure from individual practices to the segment level. Identifies occasions for breaking down rhetorical closure at the three levels of analysis. At the individual level, opportunities are related to daily users' practices. At the organizational level, opportunities are related to ongoing organizational decisions and negotiations regarding IT adoption. At the segment level, opportunities are related to forming coalitions, networks and groups of users. Originality/value – Adopts an original perspective, examining the concept of rhetorical closure from a combination of two approaches: social shaping of technology and communicative action theory. Connects different types of closure to different types of rationality, and recognizes the specific validity claims underlying them. Calls into question current decision-making processes that sustain IT pervasiveness and taken-for-granted assumptions of inevitability associated with new IT fashions. Keywords Communication technologies, Cost benefit analysis, Cost effectiveness, General management

Suggested Citation

  • Marlei Pozzebon & Ryad Titah & Alain Pinsonneault, 2006. "Combining social shaping of technology and communicative action theory for understanding rhetorical closure in IT," Post-Print hal-02311856, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02311856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mathieu Detchessahar & Benoît Journé, 2018. "Managing Strategic Discussions in Organizations: A Habermasian Perspective," Post-Print hal-02070709, HAL.
    2. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Iskandarova, Marfuga & Geels, Frank W., 2023. "“Bigger than government”: Exploring the social construction and contestation of net-zero industrial megaprojects in England," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02311856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.