IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02151028.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impacts of the Québec carbon emissions trading scheme on plant-level performance and employment

Author

Listed:
  • Julien Hanoteau

    (KEDGE Business School [Marseille], AMSE - Aix-Marseille Sciences Economiques - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - ECM - École Centrale de Marseille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • David Talbot

    (ENAP - École nationale d'administration publique (Québec, Province))

Abstract

In 2013, Québec implemented a greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions trading system (QC ETS), despite opposition from industry, which feared loss of competitiveness and warned about job destruction. This article assesses the impact of that carbon regulation on industrial facilities in Québec. Conditional difference-in-differences ordinary least squares regressions show that regulated plants reduced their GHG emissions by about 9.8%, employment by about 6.8% and carbon intensity by about 3.7% more compared to non-regulated plants in the rest of Canada during the period 2013–2015. This suggests that facilities adapted to the new program by improving their technology, but first and foremost by scaling down their activity, which raises questions about the ability of the QC ETS to induce enough environmental investment and innovation in industrial facilities. The results, in terms of employment effects, contrast with the findings of similar studies on the early stages of the European ETS and the British Columbia carbon tax scheme, and this information challenges the initial allocation scheme for permits, in particular, with a view to a green fiscal reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Julien Hanoteau & David Talbot, 2019. "Impacts of the Québec carbon emissions trading scheme on plant-level performance and employment," Post-Print hal-02151028, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02151028
    DOI: 10.1080/17583004.2019.1595154
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://amu.hal.science/hal-02151028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://amu.hal.science/hal-02151028/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17583004.2019.1595154?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Guifu & Wei, Boyu, 2024. "Low-carbon city pilots and site selection for migrant employment: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. Wang, Xu & Wen, Ziyu & He, Lingyun & Zheng, Haoyang & Yang, Tengfei & Long, Ruyin, 2024. "The role of imperfect market structure in the employment effect of emissions trading scheme in China: A theoretical extension and empirical investigation," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 920-937.
    3. Shenhai Huang & Chao Du & Xian Jin & Daini Zhang & Shiyan Wen & Zhijie Jia, 2023. "The Impact of Carbon Emission Trading on Renewable Energy: A Comparative Analysis Based on the CGE Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Felix Pretis, 2022. "Does a Carbon Tax Reduce CO2 Emissions? Evidence from British Columbia," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(1), pages 115-144, September.
    5. Jiansong Xu, 2024. "The Role of Carbon Pricing in Food Inflation: Evidence from Canadian Provinces," Papers 2404.09467, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    6. Wu, Rongxin & Tan, Zhizhou & Lin, Boqiang, 2023. "Does carbon emission trading scheme really improve the CO2 emission efficiency? Evidence from China's iron and steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental regulation; carbon market; employment; climate policy;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02151028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.