Author
Listed:
- Thomas Loilier
(NIMEC - Normandie Innovation Marché Entreprise Consommation - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - ULH - Université Le Havre Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - IRIHS - Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire Homme et Société - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université)
- Albéric Tellier
(NIMEC - Normandie Innovation Marché Entreprise Consommation - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - ULH - Université Le Havre Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - IRIHS - Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire Homme et Société - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université)
Abstract
The subject of this research is collaboration within virtual innovation networks. These project-teams are made up of geographically dispersed individuals who are temporarily brought together, and make use of information and communication technology (ICT) to support communication and the realisation of the project. Existing literature on the relationships between members of a group accords ‘trust' the central coordinating role. However, it seems acknowledged that this confidence relies essentially on personal or ‘face-to-face' knowledge of the other individuals. Our aim is to study the conditions in which trust can be a method of coordination when there is no direct and immediate interaction between the principles of the innovation project. In order to reply to this question, we will analyse the functioning of open-source software development teams associated with the Linux project. It appears that the absence of simultaneous direct interaction significantly limits interpersonal trust. This lack of trust is compensated for in part by a high level of ‘institutional' trust, but also by a formalised control mechanism, the combination of these assuring a high level of performance. We have also distanced ourselves from methodologies that give particular importance to trust as an alternative to control, in preference for an integrated perspective. In particular, control sanctions can be used without de-motivating the Linux community members because it complements a global control system similar to that of social control.
Suggested Citation
Thomas Loilier & Albéric Tellier, 2004.
"Can you trust someone you do not see? The Case of Open Source software development,"
Post-Print
hal-02148364, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02148364
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02148364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.