IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02147818.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Startup Engagement as Part of the Technology Strategy Planning -How Rheinmetall Automotive Increases Innovation by Using Corporate Venturing

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Neumann
  • Dominik Hintzen
  • Andreas Riel

    (G-SCOP_CPP - Conception Produit Process - G-SCOP - Laboratoire des sciences pour la conception, l'optimisation et la production - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UGA [2016-2019] - Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019])

  • Gert Waldhausen
  • Heinrich Dismon

Abstract

In a fast changing environment that is affected by global megatrends, disruptive technological developments and a growing number of new market players, global tier-one suppliers to the automotive industry have to adapt their technology strategy planning by considering current trends in innovation management to maintain their prevailing leading position. This paper presents Rheinmetall Automotive's approach to adopt modern Open Innovation paradigms with a focus on outside-in innovation through Corporate Venturing. Embedded in their Technological Direction Development Process, Rheinmetall Automotive has developed a strategic model to plan startup engagement to improve the current product development and enhance further diversification. Here we describe the several steps how this company-specific strategic model was designed and what prerequisites have to be taken into account to introduce the model in a corporate context.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Neumann & Dominik Hintzen & Andreas Riel & Gert Waldhausen & Heinrich Dismon, 2019. "Startup Engagement as Part of the Technology Strategy Planning -How Rheinmetall Automotive Increases Innovation by Using Corporate Venturing," Post-Print hal-02147818, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02147818
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-28005-5_58
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02147818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02147818/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/978-3-030-28005-5_58?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kohler, Thomas, 2016. "Corporate accelerators: Building bridges between corporations and startups," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 347-357.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steven Rottmann, 2019. "Corporate Venturing Evaluation: How Start-Up Performance is Measured in Corporate Venturing During the Collaboration Phase," European Journal of Business Science and Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics, vol. 5(2), pages 185-199.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    2. Emil Lucian Crișan & Irina Iulia Salanță & Ioana Natalia Beleiu & Ovidiu Niculae Bordean & Raluca Bunduchi, 2021. "A systematic literature review on accelerators," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 62-89, February.
    3. Buyukbalci, Pinar & Sanguineti, Francesca & Sacco, Federica, 2024. "Rejuvenating business models via startup collaborations: Evidence from the Turkish context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. J. Piet Hausberg & Sabrina Korreck, 2020. "Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 151-176, February.
    5. Patrizia Ghisellini & Ivana Quinto & Renato Passaro & Sergio Ulgiati, 2024. "Exploring environmental and social performances of circular start‐ups: An orientation and certification assessment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3222-3241, May.
    6. Riikkinen, Mikko & Pihlajamaa, Matti, 2022. "Achieving a strategic fit in fintech collaboration – A case study of Nordea Bank," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 461-472.
    7. Maha Shehadeh & Ahmad Almohtaseb & Jehad Aldehayyat & Ibrahim A. Abu-AlSondos, 2023. "Digital Transformation and Competitive Advantage in the Service Sector: A Moderated-Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Granados, Cristian & Ayala, Yarid & Ramos-Mejia, Monica, 2024. "Is it substantive or just symbolic? Understanding innovation theater in organisations: The case of technology-based innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    9. Tobias Gutmann, 2019. "Harmonizing corporate venturing modes: an integrative review and research agenda," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 121-157, June.
    10. Michał Bańka & Mariusz Salwin & Roman Tylżanowski & Ireneusz Miciuła & Monika Sychowicz & Norbert Chmiel & Adrian Kopytowski, 2023. "Start-Up Accelerators and Their Impact on Entrepreneurship and Social Responsibility of the Manager," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-32, May.
    11. Ben Spigel & Fizza Khalid & David Wolfe, 2023. "Alacrity: a new model for venture acceleration," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 237-259, March.
    12. Urbig, Diemo & Reif, Karina & Lengsfeld, Stephan & Procher, Vivien D., 2021. "Promoting or preventing entrepreneurship? Employers’ perceptions of and reactions to employees’ entrepreneurial side jobs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    13. Clayton, Paige, 2024. "Mentored without incubation: Start-up survival, funding, and the role of entrepreneurial support organization services," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(4).
    14. Pierrick Bouffaron & Benoit Weil & Pascal Le Masson & Cédric Denis-Rémis, 2019. "Re-inventing corporate innovation through incubation. The VINCI Leonard case study," Post-Print hal-02321451, HAL.
    15. Brian J. Bergman & Jeffery S. McMullen, 2022. "Helping Entrepreneurs Help Themselves: A Review and Relational Research Agenda on Entrepreneurial Support Organizations," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 688-728, May.
    16. Alberto Bettanti & Antonella Lanati & Alessandro Missoni, 2022. "Biopharmaceutical innovation ecosystems: a stakeholder model and the case of Lombardy," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 1948-1973, December.
    17. Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Aslam, Muhammad Mahmood & Qiu, Yixin, 2021. "Coworking spaces: Understanding, using, and managing sociomateriality," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 119-130.
    18. Ross Brown & Suzanne Mawson & Neil Lee & Lauren Peterson, 2019. "Start-up factories, transnational entrepreneurs and entrepreneurial ecosystems: unpacking the lure of start-up accelerator programmes," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 885-904, May.
    19. Ángel Peiró‐Signes & Inés Díez‐Martínez & Marival Segarra‐Oña, 2024. "The drivers of cooperation for innovation and the role of environmental orientation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 2929-2952, July.
    20. Haslanger, Patrick, 2019. "The landscape of corporate venturing in Germany: Insights on corporate venture capitals and corporate accelerators," UO Working Papers 01-19, University of Augsburg, Chair of Management and Organization.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02147818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.