IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02137834.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Price competition in air transport market, Some Empirical evidences

Author

Listed:
  • Chantal Roucolle

    (LEEA - ENAC - Laboratoire d'Economie et d'Econométrie de l'Aérien - ENAC - Ecole Nationale de l'Aviation Civile)

  • Karimi Shervin

    (ENAC - Ecole Nationale de l'Aviation Civile)

Abstract

Empirical studies related to air transport market show that airlines price discriminate when they are in a monopoly situation (Gale and Holmes, 1993). This is consistent with economic theory. Some empirical literature related to airline pricing shows however that airlines practice price discrimination even though they have limited monopoly market power (Dana 1998). Stavins (2001) shows that market concentration leads to a reduction in discount granted to tickets with restrictions, when those restrictions are used as discriminatory tools. The theory related to price discrimination is then controversial in air transport markets: price discrimination does not necessarily increase as the markets become more competitive. Beyond discrimination process, the pricing policy of an airline is based on revenue management. That is, the portfolio of prices supplied to customers varies according to revenue management imperative. In terms of revenue management, many European airlines use the Revenue Management System provided by Amadeus. The optimization process, basis of the RMS, uses only historical data of the company to maximise the revenue on each flight. It results in opening or closing classes during the life time of the flight booking, taking into account the load factor and the level of demand. During this optimisation process the competitive pressure exerted by airlines on the same route is never addressed. As a consequence, RM analysts daily observe competitive prices and adapt the pricing of their company. This leads to a sound homogenisation of airlines pricing strategies while competing on the market. This observation is contradictory with Netessine and Shumsky (2004) and Lua (2006) results. Netessine and Shumsky (2004) and Lua (2006) suggest that airlines should differentiate their strategies in order to maximize their revenue on a flight. Using French data on transatlantic routes, we estimate the direct effect of competition on the daily prices supplied by a selected airline. We focus our analysis on economy tickets in order to simplify this preliminary analysis. We find a statistical significant dependence between reservation date and the level of prices. We also control for the route and the departure day. These variables appear to have a significant influence on the level of prices. Finally, the prices supplied on the same routes by competitors in the previous days are statistically significant. This confirms RM analysts' behaviour, although the sense of competitors' price effect depends on the competitor. Thus our results are not perfectly opposite to Netessine and Shumsky (2004) and Lua (2006) findings. The next step of our analysis will consist in using a system of price equations, each of them corresponding to an airline, to better identify and assess the interactions between airlines. Then the global system of competition in price on the market into consideration will be analysed.

Suggested Citation

  • Chantal Roucolle & Karimi Shervin, 2014. "Price competition in air transport market, Some Empirical evidences," Post-Print hal-02137834, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02137834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02137834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.