IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02117651.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A typology of brand counterfeiting and imitation based on a semiotic approach

Author

Listed:
  • André Le Roux

    (LCPC/DTOA - Direction technique "Ouvrages d'art" - LCPC - Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées, CEREGE [Poitiers, La Rochelle] - Centre de recherche en gestion [EA 1722] - IAE Poitiers - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - ULR - La Rochelle Université)

  • François Bobrie

    (IAE Poitiers - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers, CEREGE [Poitiers, La Rochelle] - Centre de recherche en gestion [EA 1722] - IAE Poitiers - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - ULR - La Rochelle Université)

  • Marinette Thébault

    (CEREGE [Poitiers, La Rochelle] - Centre de recherche en gestion [EA 1722] - IAE Poitiers - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - ULR - La Rochelle Université)

Abstract

Counterfeiting and imitation are major issues for luxury products and brands. This research proposes a conceptualization of brand based on a semiotic approach and a typology of counterfeit and imitation comprising two dimensions: logotype and product appearance. A survey testing stimuli developed according to the typology explores consumer reactions to different modalities of counterfeiting and imitation onfive brands. A dominantcategorization schema based on brand name emerged, although some product categories deviate from this pattern. The discussion draws implications for brand research, suggesting that typicality may explain the dichotomy in the categorization schema and acceptability of stimuli, as well as managerial implications

Suggested Citation

  • André Le Roux & François Bobrie & Marinette Thébault, 2016. "A typology of brand counterfeiting and imitation based on a semiotic approach," Post-Print hal-02117651, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02117651
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.08.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adriana Grigorescu & Amalia-Elena Ion, 2022. "Qualitative Analysis of Sustainability and Innovation Within the Luxury Business Sector," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 3150-3171, December.
    2. André Le Roux & Marinette Thébault & Yves Roy, 2019. "Exploring consumer behavior regarding counterfeiting: how product category, product attributes, purchase situation and consumers' motivations profiles impact behavior regarding counterfeits and genuin," Post-Print hal-02396977, HAL.
    3. Wang, Yingjia & Fan, Di & Fung, Yi-Ning & Luo, Suyuan, 2022. "Consumer-to-consumer product exchanges for original fashion brands in the sharing economy: Good or bad for fashion knockoffs?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    4. Grigorescu Adriana & Ion Amalia Elena, 2020. "Innovation and product management – The direction of the 21st century luxury market," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 1035-1045, July.
    5. André Le Roux & Marinette Thébault & Yves Roy, 2019. "Do product category and consumers' motivations profiles matter regarding counterfeiting?," Post-Print hal-02396896, HAL.
    6. Song, Hanqun & Yang, Huijun & Ma, Emily, 2022. "Restaurants’ outdoor signs say more than you think: An enquiry from a linguistic landscape perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Wang, Li & Jin, Manhui & Yang, Zhiyong, 2020. "Regulatory focus and consumption of counterfeit luxury goods: Roles of functional theories of attitudes and perceived similarity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 50-61.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02117651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.