IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02008934.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Horizontal collaborative transport: survey of solutions and practical implementation issues

Author

Listed:
  • Shenle Pan

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Damien Trentesaux

    (LAMIH - Laboratoire d'Automatique, de Mécanique et d'Informatique industrielles et Humaines - UMR 8201 - UVHC - Université de Valenciennes et du Hainaut-Cambrésis - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Eric Ballot

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • George Q. Huang

    (HKU - The University of Hong Kong)

Abstract

Horizontal collaboration has been considered as effective practice for sustainable logistics and freight transport and it has gained increased attention in recent years. This paper aims to provide a survey of the development of horizontal collaborative transport (HCT) over the past ten years, to identify research trends and gaps, then to propose some research opportunities. The paper also aims to provide guidelines to logistics companies who wish to embark on HCT, to help them choose which HCT solution to implement. To provide a comprehensive and structured review, the paper follows the methodology in the literature. A total of 120 scientific papers published between 2007 and 2017 were reviewed. A survey framework based on two axes-HCT solutions and implementation issues-is developed to analyse and position the papers. The results show that, regarding HCT solutions, carrier alliance and flow controller collaboration were the most frequently studied. But recent innovative solutions such as pooling and physical internet are also gaining increased attention. Regarding implementation issues, the focus of the literature has been on the development of decision-making models, including transport planning, lane exchange, and gain sharing. Conversely, managerial and technological issues have received less attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Shenle Pan & Damien Trentesaux & Eric Ballot & George Q. Huang, 2019. "Horizontal collaborative transport: survey of solutions and practical implementation issues," Post-Print hal-02008934, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02008934
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1574040
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://minesparis-psl.hal.science/hal-02008934v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://minesparis-psl.hal.science/hal-02008934v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2019.1574040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefan Creemers & Gert Woumans & Robert Boute & Jeroen Beliën, 2017. "Tri-Vizor Uses an Efficient Algorithm to Identify Collaborative Shipping Opportunities," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 244-259, June.
    2. Zhanguo Zhu & Feng Chu & Alexandre Dolgui & Chengbin Chu & Wei Zhou & Selwyn Piramuthu, 2018. "Recent advances and opportunities in sustainable food supply chain: a model-oriented review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(17), pages 5700-5722, September.
    3. Amir Hossein Gharehgozli & René de Koster & Rick Jansen, 2017. "Collaborative solutions for inter terminal transport," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(21), pages 6527-6546, November.
    4. Ben Jouida, Sihem & Krichen, Saoussen & Klibi, Walid, 2017. "Coalition-formation problem for sourcing contract design in supply networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(2), pages 539-558.
    5. Stefan Creemers & Gert Woumans & Robert Boute & Jeroen Beliën, 2017. "Tri-Vizor Uses an Efficient Algorithm to Identify Collaborative Shipping Opportunities," Post-Print hal-01745271, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Öner, Nihat & Kuyzu, Gültekin, 2021. "Core stable coalition selection in collaborative truckload transportation procurement," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Ben Jouida, Sihem & Guajardo, Mario & Klibi, Walid & Krichen, Saoussen, 2021. "Profit maximizing coalitions with shared capacities in distribution networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 480-495.
    3. De Moor, Bram J. & Creemers, Stefan & Boute, Robert N., 2023. "Breaking truck dominance in supply chains: Proactive freight consolidation and modal split transport," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    4. Thomas Hacardiaux & Christof Defryn & Jean-Sébastien Tancrez & Lotte Verdonck, 2022. "Balancing partner preferences for logistics costs and carbon footprint in a horizontal cooperation," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(1), pages 121-153, March.
    5. Creemers, Stefan & Boute, Robert, 2022. "The joint replenishment problem: Optimal policy and exact evaluation method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(3), pages 1175-1188.
    6. Thomas Hacardiaux & Jean-Sébastien Tancrez, 2020. "Assessing the environmental benefits of horizontal cooperation using a location-inventory model," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(4), pages 1363-1387, December.
    7. Boshuai Zhao & Roel Leus, 2022. "An improved decomposition-based heuristic for truck platooning," Papers 2210.05562, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    8. Hacardiaux, Thomas & Defryn, Christof & Tancrez, Jean-Sébastien & Verdonck, Lotte, 2020. "Balancing partner preferences for logistics costs and carbon footprint in a horizontal cooperation," Research Memorandum 002, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    9. Fracarolli Nunes, Mauro & Lee Park, Camila & Shin, Hyunju, 2021. "Corporate social and environmental irresponsibilities in supply chains, contamination, and damage of intangible resources: A behavioural approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    10. Adrián Csordás & Péter Lengyel & István Füzesi, 2022. "Who Prefers Regional Products? A Systematic Literature Review of Consumer Characteristics and Attitudes in Short Food Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Najafi, Mehdi & Zolfagharinia, Hossein, 2024. "A Multi-objective integrated approach to address sustainability in a meat supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    12. Lange, Ann-Kathrin & Kreuz, Felix & Langkau, Sven & Jahn, Carlos & Clausen, Uwe, 2020. "Defining the quota of truck appointment systems," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferen, volume 30, pages 211-246, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    13. Rohmer, S.U.K. & Gerdessen, J.C. & Claassen, G.D.H., 2019. "Sustainable supply chain design in the food system with dietary considerations: A multi-objective analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1149-1164.
    14. Ali Saeed Almuflih & Janpriy Sharma & Mohit Tyagi & Arvind Bhardwaj & Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi & Nawaf Khan, 2022. "Leveraging the Dynamics of Food Supply Chains towards Avenues of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    15. Feng Li & Qingyuan Zhu & Liang Liang, 2019. "A new data envelopment analysis based approach for fixed cost allocation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 347-372, March.
    16. Maria Elena Latino & Marta Menegoli & Martina De Giovanni, 2021. "Evaluating the Sustainability Dimensions in the Food Supply Chain: Literature Review and Research Routes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, October.
    17. Esteban Ogazón & Neale R. Smith & Angel Ruiz, 2022. "Reconfiguration of Foodbank Network Logistics to Cope with a Sudden Disaster," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, April.
    18. Nassim Mrabti & Nadia Hamani & Laurent Delahoche, 2022. "A Comprehensive Literature Review on Sustainable Horizontal Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-38, September.
    19. Himanshu Gupta & Manjeet Kharub & Kumar Shreshth & Ashwani Kumar & Donald Huisingh & Anil Kumar, 2023. "Evaluation of strategies to manage risks in smart, sustainable agri‐logistics sector: A Bayesian‐based group decision‐making approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4335-4359, November.
    20. Matsui, Kenji, 2019. "A supply chain member should set its margin later if another member's cost is highly uncertain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 127-138.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Survey; Horizontal Collaboration; Freight Transport; Solutions and Practical Implementation issues; Sustainability;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02008934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.