IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01909127.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Les réticences à évaluer économiquement les projets de SI : propositions d’explication

Author

Listed:
  • Bernard Quinio

    (UN - Université de Nantes, Ecole Supérieure de Commerce de Paris)

Abstract

The economic evaluation of Information System project (the weighting up of investment and expected benefits) has been primarly adressed to answer the question " how to do it ". Several interesting propositions have been made in order to make this evaluation; some of them have been tested. Nevertheless, the practice of evaluation is poor and the 'productivity paradox of Information Technology' is still alive. A new approach of evaluation is proposed. " Why so many enterprises do not evaluate their projects ? " The answer can be found more in the actors' social-interests than in new evaluations techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernard Quinio, 1998. "Les réticences à évaluer économiquement les projets de SI : propositions d’explication," Post-Print hal-01909127, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01909127
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.parisnanterre.fr/hal-01909127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.parisnanterre.fr/hal-01909127/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bernard Quinio & Rolande Marciniak, 2009. "Institutionalism and Information Systems: Current State of the Art and Position of French Research," Post-Print hal-01755739, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01909127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.