IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01872194.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quelle mesure pour la culture nationale ? Hofstede vs Schwartz vs Globe

Author

Listed:
  • Emna Moalla

    (Laboratoire de Recherche Magellan - UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Lyon, ESSCA - Ecole Supérieure des Sciences Commerciales d'Angers)

Abstract

La culture nationale « ou distance culturelle » a fait l'objet de plusieurs recherches dans le champ du management international (MI). Afin de mesurer la distance culturelle, ces recherches ont largement mobilisé le cadre culturel de Hofstede. Cet article évalue et compare les différents cadres culturels les plus importants en MI. S'appuyant sur un échantillon d'opérations de rapprochement menées par des entreprises françaises à l'étranger, l'étude révèle des résultats différents selon le cadre culturel mobilisé. Si les cadres culturels de Schwartz et de Globe, tout comme le cadre révisé de Hofstede, semblent influencer le choix du mode d'entrée, aucune incidence ne résulte du cadre culturel initial de Hofstede.

Suggested Citation

  • Emna Moalla, 2016. "Quelle mesure pour la culture nationale ? Hofstede vs Schwartz vs Globe," Post-Print hal-01872194, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01872194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01872194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.