IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01865105.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L'évaluation des enseignants-chercheurs via les seules revues scientifiques classées : des aspects contre-productifs pérennisés

Author

Listed:
  • Bernard Guillon

    (CREG - Centre de recherche et d'études en gestion - UPPA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour)

Abstract

The attempts of measuring regularly the academic scientific activity in France, and more particularly in sciences of management for the last ten years, has showed the importance of Scientific journals' referencing. The slidings, observed in favour of the latter, show that the initial objective-to check the activity of research in the higher education system – has disappeared in front of new stakes. Consequently the direct management of both the lecturers' and university professors' careers has arisen, even in the creation of a caste of public researchers forced to assume a certain amount of additional work. The speech about the credibility of the professors via this type of publications leads eventually to a recurring stress… and weakening of the research.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernard Guillon, 2016. "L'évaluation des enseignants-chercheurs via les seules revues scientifiques classées : des aspects contre-productifs pérennisés," Post-Print hal-01865105, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01865105
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01865105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01865105/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yvon Pesqueux, 2007. "la gestion, exception sectorielle ou prototype de la "privatisation" de l'enseignement supérieur?," Post-Print hal-00494066, HAL.
    2. Philippe Jeannin, 2004. "Les économistes et leurs revues," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 114(3), pages 275-288.
    3. Bernard Guillon, 2012. "Pallier les risques et les biais en matière de recherche doctorale en sciences de gestion," Post-Print hal-02431134, HAL.
    4. Pontille, David & Torny, Didier, 2010. "Revues qui comptent, revues qu’on compte :produire des classements en économie et gestion," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 8.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elise Marcandella, 2020. "Retour réflexif d’un chercheur en sciences de gestion sur sa légitimité à investiguer le terrain de l’insertion," Post-Print hal-02872684, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gérard Charreaux, 2011. "«Cité ou oublié»:les supports de la notoriété des professeurs en sciences de gestion vus à travers Google Scholar," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 14(4), pages 129-166, December.
    2. Christine Barats, 2020. "Dissemination of international rankings: characteristics of the media coverage of the Shanghai Ranking in the French press," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Pontille, David & Torny, Didier, 2010. "Revues qui comptent, revues qu’on compte :produire des classements en économie et gestion," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 8.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01865105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.