IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01594906.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparing profitability of organic and conventional farming : the impact of support on arable farming in France

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Rainelli

    (ESR, Rennes - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • Dominique Vermersch

    (Unité d'économie et sociologie rurales de rennes - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

Abstract

L'agriculture biologique dans le domaine des grandes cultures est caractérisée par un très fort déficit de l'offre. Cela tient à une profitabilité moins assurée en raison des prairies temporaires dans l'assolement. Or ce type de culture ne bénéficie pas de paiements compensatoires, d'où un manque à gagner par rapport au conventionnel. Dans la mesure où les grandes cultures biologiques évitent à la société des dépenses de protection de l'environnement, une telle distorsion dans les aides directes n'est pas justifiée.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Rainelli & Dominique Vermersch, 1999. "Comparing profitability of organic and conventional farming : the impact of support on arable farming in France," Post-Print hal-01594906, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01594906
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01594906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01594906/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01594906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.