IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01507475.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Uptakes in the EU-5 Markets: A Descriptive Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • François Bocquet

    (IDS - U1145 - Institut Droit et Santé - UPD5 - Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale)

  • Pascal Paubel

    (IDS - U1145 - Institut Droit et Santé - UPD5 - Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale)

  • Isabelle Fusier

    (Hôpital Necker - Enfants Malades [AP-HP] - AP-HP - Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP))

  • Anne-Laure Cordonnier

    (Hôpital Necker - Enfants Malades [AP-HP] - AP-HP - Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP))

  • Claude Le Pen

    (LEDa - Laboratoire d'Economie de Dauphine - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Martine Sinègre

    (Hôpital Necker - Enfants Malades [AP-HP] - AP-HP - Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP))

Abstract

Background Biosimilars are copies of biological reference medicines. Unlike generics (copies of chemical molecules), biologics are complex, expensive and complicated to produce. The knowledge of the factors affecting the competition following patent expiry for biologics remains limited. Objectives The aims of this study were to analyse the EU-5 Granulocyte-Colon Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) markets and to determine the factors affecting the G-CSF biosimilar uptakes, particularly that of biosimilar prices relative to originators. Methods Data on medicine volumes, values, and ex-manufacturer prices for all G-CSF categories were provided by IMS Health. Volumes were calculated in defined daily doses (DDD) and prices in Euros per DDD. In the EU-5 countries, there is 5 years of experience with biosimilar G-CSFs (2007–2011). Results Two G-CSF market profiles exist: (1) countries with a high retail market distribution, which are the largest G-CSF markets with low global G-CSF biosimilar uptakes (5.4 % in France and 8.5 % in Germany in 2011); and (2) countries with a dominant hospital channel, which are the smallest markets with higher G-CSF biosimilar uptakes (12.4 % in Spain and 20.4 % in the UK). The more the decisions are decentralized, the more their uptakes are high. The price difference between G-CSF biosimilars and their reference plays a marginal role at a global level (price differences of +13.3 % in the UK and −20.4 % in France). Conclusion The competition with G-CSF biosimilars varies significantly between EU-5 countries, probably because of G-CSF distribution channel differences. Currently, this competition is not mainly based on prices, but on local political options to stimulate tendering between them and recently branded second- or third-generation products.

Suggested Citation

  • François Bocquet & Pascal Paubel & Isabelle Fusier & Anne-Laure Cordonnier & Claude Le Pen & Martine Sinègre, 2014. "Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Uptakes in the EU-5 Markets: A Descriptive Analysis," Post-Print hal-01507475, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01507475
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-014-0087-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pieter Dylst & Arnold Vulto & Steven Simoens, 2014. "Barriers to the Uptake of Biosimilars and Possible Solutions: A Belgian Case Study," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 32(7), pages 681-691, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01507475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.