IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01395638.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L'Evaluation Du Paysage : Revue Critique De La Litterature

Author

Listed:
  • François Facchini

    (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

This article deals with the feasible lands cape evaluation techniques for helping the public decision. A first part, set out the geographical and ecological works on lands cape evaluation. ft demonstrates the great heterogeneity measures and the ir incapacity of those techniques lead us to emphasize the great interest of the economie valuation methods. That why the second part studies the travel cost method and hedonic priee method and nevertheless show that these methods are not relevant for the public decision-maker. In the third part, the contingent valuation method is exposed. This fast method appears to be satisfactory for the decision-maker and easy to apply. So the landscape valuation is difficult but not impossible.

Suggested Citation

  • François Facchini, 1994. "L'Evaluation Du Paysage : Revue Critique De La Litterature," Post-Print hal-01395638, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01395638
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01395638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01395638/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01395638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.