IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01086379.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Kitchen confidential? Norms for the use of transferred knowledge in gourmet cuisine

Author

Listed:
  • Giada Di Stefano

    (GREGH - Groupement de Recherche et d'Etudes en Gestion à HEC - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Andrew D. King
  • Gianmario Verona

    (Bocconi University - Bocconi University [Milan, Italy])

Abstract

When will knowledge holders share their knowledge with peers? Several studies suggest that norms of knowledge disclosure encourage knowledge transfer. More recently, scholars have hypothesized that norms of knowledge use may indirectly promote it. In this article, we synthesize a theoretical framework of the effect of norms of knowledge use and test its predictions by means of a field experiment involving more than 500 Italian chefs. For the literature on knowledge transfer, we confirm the importance of norms, but we also show that they are not complete substitutes for other means of protecting private knowledge. For the literature on social norms, we provide evidence of how actors assess others' propensity to conform and how this influences the intention to participate in the norm-regulated exchange. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Giada Di Stefano & Andrew D. King & Gianmario Verona, 2014. "Kitchen confidential? Norms for the use of transferred knowledge in gourmet cuisine," Post-Print hal-01086379, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01086379
    DOI: 10.1002/smj.2179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas Mellewigt & Adeline Thomas & Ingo Weller & Edward J. Zajac, 2017. "Alliance or Acquisition? A Mechanisms‐Based, Policy‐Capturing Analysis," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(12), pages 2353-2369, December.
    2. Vestal, Alex & Danneels, Erwin, 2018. "Knowledge exchange in clusters: The contingent role of regional inventive concentration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 1887-1903.
    3. Richard A. Bettis & Constance E. Helfat & J. Myles Shaver & Arturs Kalnins, 2016. "Beyond Manhattan: Localized competition and organizational failure in urban hotel markets throughout the United States, 2000–2014," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(11), pages 2235-2253, November.
    4. Juei-Ling Ho & Cheng-Fa Lin & Mei-Ying Lai & Liang-Yi Tseng & Tai-Ying Chiang, 2021. "Building Theory From Practice: Mapping Executive Chefs’ Menu Planning Processes Using a Flowchart," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    5. Julia Bauer & Nikolaus Franke & Philipp Tuertscher, 2016. "Intellectual Property Norms in Online Communities: How User-Organized Intellectual Property Regulation Supports Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 724-750, December.
    6. Victoria Sevcenko & Sendil Ethiraj, 2018. "How Do Firms Appropriate Value from Employees with Transferable Skills? A Study of the Appropriation Puzzle in Actively Managed Mutual Funds," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 775-795, October.
    7. Saverio Dave Favaron & Giada Di Stefano & Rodolphe Durand, 2022. "Michelin Is Coming to Town: Organizational Responses to Status Shocks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6925-6949, September.
    8. Matthieu Mandard, 2016. "Les mécanismes de protection des innovations contre l’imitation : un cadre d’analyse générique et un inventaire," Post-Print halshs-01404247, HAL.
    9. Tomasz Obloj & Todd Zenger, 2017. "Organization Design, Proximity, and Productivity Responses to Upward Social Comparison," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Linda Argote & Sunkee Lee & Jisoo Park, 2021. "Organizational Learning Processes and Outcomes: Major Findings and Future Research Directions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5399-5429, September.
    11. Zaggl, Michael A., 2017. "Manipulation of explicit reputation in innovation and knowledge exchange communities: The example of referencing in science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 970-983.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01086379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.